Search for: "Matter of Investigative Grand Jury Proceedings"
Results 261 - 280
of 813
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
Clinton’s impeachment, there was no dispute that he had committed the federal crime of lying under oath to a grand jury. [read post]
25 Dec 2019, 11:00 pm
“After reviewing historical and legal precedent, we conclude only that presidential immunity does not bar the enforcement of a state grand jury subpoena directing a third party to produce non‐privileged material, even when the subject matter under investigation pertains to the President,” the Second Circuit held. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 4:51 pm
One of the other cases involves a subpoena by congressional investigators with the House Oversight Committee, seeking the same records – and for the same reasons – as the state grand jury is seeking. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 8:24 am
In both cases much of the investigative work had been done earlier, in secret: by special counsels working within the Department of Justice, and before grand juries. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 10:08 am
James Rogan and approved on a party-line vote, added language to the article concerning Bill Clinton’s false statements to the grand jury. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:00 am
In response to Goldsmith, Benjamin Wittes argued first that Goldsmith’s argument would lead to an absurd conclusion: If the clear statement rule applied to the perjury statute, which also doesn’t by its terms apply to the president, the president could lie to a grand jury, which would have “come as a surprise to Bill Clinton. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:49 am
Vance is the least significant of the cases because the information Mazars provides to the grand jury will almost certainly stay in the grand jury: Just as under federal law, New York law mandates strict secrecy with respect to matters and information before a grand jury. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
In their petition urging the high court to hear their appeal, Trump’s lawyers argued he was immune from all criminal proceedings and investigations so long as he remained in office. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 11:00 am
Vance The District Attorney of New York County Cyrus Vance has issued a grand jury subpoena to Mazars USA LLP seeking “a wide variety of financial records dating from January 1, 2011 to the present and relating to the President, the Trump Organization, and several related entities” as part of an ongoing state grand-jury proceeding. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:17 am
What impact does the grand jury’s verdict have on the underlying case? [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 4:35 am
The proceedings below The Vance case arises out of a subpoena issued by New York County (Manhattan) District Attorney Cyrus Vance to Mazars for financial records as part of an ongoing state grand-jury proceeding that, as the U.S. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 10:44 am
There is no Sixth Amendment right either to witness confrontation or a public hearing at the grand jury stage, where the proceedings are secret according to statute. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:35 am
Bottom line is that while there is a grand jury proceeding in state court that is dealing with these possible criminal acts, the federal court has authority to take up the issues raised in this case. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am
Even under the prevailing doctrine within the executive branch, there are a number of reasons that an assertion of privilege would be difficult in the context of an impeachment inquiry (which may be why the administration has so forcefully denied that the House’s current inquiries actually constitute impeachment proceedings). [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 8:09 am
The juror served on the grand jury which found the indictment. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The texts, which former special U.S. envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker provided investigators, reveal officials felt Trump would not agree to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky unless Zelensky promised to launch the investigations, and did so publicly. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 7:15 am
In all prior impeachment proceedings, the House has investigated the charges prior to holding any vote. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:10 pm
Impeachment has frequently been analogized to a grand jury indictment, and the analogy is informative here. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:25 am
A House impeachment is sometimes analogized to a grand jury indictment, and with good reason. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 4:02 pm
The hearsay rule doesn’t apply to police investigations or grand jury proceedings, and it most definitely does not apply to whistleblower complaints. [read post]
