Search for: "Matter of Jaffe"
Results 1 - 20
of 185
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
Instead, the court will tell the jury that Doe's claims succeed as a matter of law and that the jury may not revisit that issue. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
Instead, the court will tell the jury that Doe's claims succeed as a matter of law and that the jury may not revisit that issue. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
Instead, the court will tell the jury that Doe's claims succeed as a matter of law and that the jury may not revisit that issue. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
Instead, the court will tell the jury that Doe's claims succeed as a matter of law and that the jury may not revisit that issue. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:23 pm
The Court understands that Plaintiff has alleged unfortunate circumstances and reasonable fears, but the Court finds that this matter does not rise to the type of exceptional case needed to proceed pseudonymously. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 7:59 am
~ Susan Jaffe 16. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
First, this litigation involves matters that are highly sensitive and of a personal nature. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 11:14 am
Yet as a general matter, such concerns, which are present in many cases (especially in employment cases), don't justify pseudonymity. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
National/Federal Trump Compares Political Opponents to ‘Vermin’ Who He Will ‘Root Out,’ Alarming Historians ABC News – Soo Rin Kim and Lalee Ibssa | Published: 11/13/2023 Donald Trump vowed to “root out” his political opponents, who he said “live like vermin” as he warned supporters that America’s greatest threats come “from within” – extreme rhetoric that echoes the words of fascist dictators like Adolf Hitler… [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 3:00 pm
First, it matters doctrinally. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:42 am
In September, Taft Stettinius merged with Jaffe Raitt Heuer & Weiss PC, which was representing Partners Detroit, a claimant in a ‘contentious arbitration’ opposite MGM, according to the complaint. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:02 am
(Note that Schaerr | Jaffe's Gene Schaerr, Erik Jaffe, and Joshua Prince and I filed an amicus brief in the case, on behalf of Protect the 1st Foundation and myself, advocating for this result. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
Senate Bill 1106 would put into state law that once people become candidates for any public office, they cannot have their posting rights taken away, essentially no matter what they say, truthful or otherwise. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 7:11 am
Wynne & Jaffe, 599 F.2d 707, 713 (5th Cir. 1979) (denying plaintiffs' request to proceed under a pseudonym, partly because plaintiffs "face no greater threat of retaliation than the typical plaintiff alleging Title VII violations, including the other women who, under their real names and not anonymously, have filed sex discrimination suits against large law firm"). [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 4:39 pm
(See my Intermediate Questions of Religious Exemptions, pp. 652-56 for more on some related matters.) [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 10:41 pm
Donziger failed to comply fully with the court's orders, it held him in criminal contempt and referred the matter to the U. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
(Logan Jaffe, Mary Hudetz and Ash Ngu, Pro Publica) If there are any attorneys or law students who identify as Black, Native Americans, or Pacific Islanders who are interested in nonprofit corporate and tax-exemption laws and who’d like to pursue this area of practice, I’m committing one hour each week to being a resource. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 11:02 pm
That will probably not matter in United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
In a letter opinion issued in connection with discovery matters in Twitter v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 7:28 am
Wynne & Jaffe (5th Cir. 1979). [read post]
