Search for: "Matter of Jonathan R. v Michael R."
Results 1 - 20
of 173
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am
Opinion No. 20190748-CA Filed December 24, 2020 Second District Court, Farmington Department The Honorable Michael Edwards No. 134701192 Jonathan Hibshman, Marco Brown, and Rodney R. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:26 pm
Hardin-Tammons (for more on the earlier 13 cases, see these posts): Jonathan R. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
Well done, BCA can favor major regulations, such as phasing out CFCs, reducing particulate matter air pollution, and sound climate policy.[12] The challenge is to get beyond “tunnel vision,”[13] and to counteract “disregard” of impacts and affected subgroups.[14]Assessing all important impacts helps overcome these cognitive limitations, and the “omitted voice” of underrepresented subgroups, by pressing policy makers to think more holistically and… [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 1:53 pm
” Samuel R. [read post]
12 Dec 2020, 9:07 am
Foreign Direct Investment, the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, and Individual Corruption Experiences in Africa Christopher Heurlin, Authoritarian Aid and Regime Durability: Soviet Aid to the Developing World and Donor–Recipient Institutional Complementarity and Capacity Simone Dietrich, Helen V Milner, & Jonathan B Slapin, From Text to Political Positions on Foreign Aid: Analysis of Aid Mentions in Party Manifestos from 1960 to 2015 Laura Seelkopf & Ida Bastiaens,… [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:57 am
As Jonathan recently noted, Ken White at Popehat has a post covering some of the ways in which Michael Brown’s robbery does and does not matter legally. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:16 am
(Jonathan H. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 1:59 pm
(Jonathan H. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:15 am
: 3-15654Case filed: December 18, 2013Qualifying judgment/order: December 18, 2013In the Matter of Jonathan Samuel DaspinAdministrative Proceeding File No. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
As Jonathan notes, the Supreme Court unanimously decided NLRB v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
That would seem to settle the matter. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW.Cannon, Jonathan. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:23 pm
(And does it matter?) [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
(And does it matter?) [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 4:54 pm
Milkovich v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 11:48 am
Read it here: Colleen V. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 2:34 pm
In King v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 6:55 pm
Michaels __ NJ__ (2014)29 Supervising chemist can testify in rape case if they independently verified correctness of DNA results State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:57 pm
Shannon R. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 7:45 am
J. 20 *** Michael V. [read post]
