Search for: "Matter of Kerr v Kerr"
Results 1 - 20
of 877
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2014, 4:15 am
According to Lord Kerr, it does not mean that the appellant has to establish as a matter of fact that the jury might have gone a different way, or even that the appellate court should be concerned to examine what the original jury at the trial might have made of the fresh evidence. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:46 pm
Kerr knows this, too. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 7:52 am
Kerr v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
Few scholars are considered more influential when it comes to the Fourth Amendment than George Washington Lawprof, and Volokh conspirator, Orin Kerr. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
Last year, he argued before the United States Supreme Court in the case of Davis v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:55 am
by Kenneth Anderson Orin Kerr is the Fourth Amendment scholar that I definitely am not, so I read with interest his Volokh post this morning on Ashcroft v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:41 pm
(Orin Kerr) Michael Risch has a post by that title over at Madisonian.Net, commenting on today’s Supreme Court decision in Mayo v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:25 am
Seguin (the companion case to Kerr v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 3:16 am
Kerr Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:00 pm
On June 19, the Indiana Supreme Court decided In the Matter of the Supervised Estate of Kent v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 9:00 pm
Orin Kerr on the Volokh Conspiracy: Applying the Mosaic Theory of the Fourth Amendment to Disclosure of Stored Records, posted April 5th: I’ve blogged a few times about United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:43 am
Read the post by Kerr and, for that matter, there lots of discussion of these two important cases around the blawgosphere. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 9:00 am
Tronox, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 8:27 am
(Orin Kerr) The outcome of NASA v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 7:38 am
’KSR Int'l Co. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 11:34 am
This case illustrates that accounting for gas royalties can be a complex matter. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 9:41 am
(Orin Kerr) No, rules Judge Jack Weinstein, at least for purposes of the Illegal Gambling Business Act (IGBA), 18 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:27 am
Circuit was titled United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 1:11 am
The annex includes a reprint of “Arbitration v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 10:52 am
But I think the majority is clearly right as a legal matter (which is the matter that matters, at least to me). [read post]
