Search for: "Matter of Klein v City of NY" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2009, 9:04 pm
Matter of Halpin v Klein, 2009 NY Slip Op 03593, Decided on May 5, 2009, Appellate Division, First Department* Joel I. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 4:59 am
Tenure by estoppelMatter of Ronga v Klein, 2011 NY Slip Op 01408, Appellate Division, First DepartmentA probationary administrator or teacher may attain tenure by estoppel [sometimes referred to as “tenure by acquiescence”] when a school board accepts the continued services of a teacher or administrator, but fails to take the action required by law to either grant or deny the individual tenure prior to the expiration of the administrator’s or… [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The essentials in processing and challenging an employee disciplinary action where compulsory arbitration is involvedDavis v New York City Board/Department of Educ., 2016 NY Slip Op 02544, Appellate Division, First DepartmentWhere the parties are subject to compulsory arbitration in determining an employee disciplinary matter pursuant to the terms and conditions set out in law or in a collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to Article 14 of the… [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Sky, LLC, 2017 NY Slip Op 30898[U], at *5 [Sup Ct, NY County 2017]; W. 189, LLC v Louis-Jeune, 2016 NY Slip Op 31614[U], at *1 [Sup Ct, NY County 2016].) [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Klein, 88 N.Y.2d 1008, 1009–1010, 648 N.Y.S.2d 871, 671 N.E.2d 1268; Lamanna v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Plaintiff's challenges to the dismissal of his claims under the New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY §8-107[1][a]) are not properly before this Court, as he had withdrawn those claims pursuant to a stipulation and filed an amended complaint asserting only causes of action under the New York State Human Rights Law (see Weinstein v City of New York, 103 AD3d 517, 517 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Plaintiff's challenges to the dismissal of his claims under the New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY §8-107[1][a]) are not properly before this Court, as he had withdrawn those claims pursuant to a stipulation and filed an amended complaint asserting only causes of action under the New York State Human Rights Law (see Weinstein v City of New York, 103 AD3d 517, 517 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiff worked for the City of New Rochelle and previously worked as General Counsel for Iona. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
” In Halpin v Klein, 62 AD3d 403,***** the employee was found guilty of administrative disciplinary charges involving absence from work based on records generated by global positioning equipment. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:01 am
It is the movant who must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, tendering sufficient evidence in admissible form to demonstrate the absence of any material issue of fact as held in Alvarez v Prospect Hosp. and Friends of Animals, Inc. v Associated Fur Mfrs. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 4:04 pm
NYC Board of Education and the UFT agreement addressing the processing of disciplinary charges filed against an educator pursuant to §3020-aThe following is the letter from NYC Department of Education Chancellor Klein to United Federation of Teachers President Michael Mulgrew concerning the processing of disciplinary charges filed against a New York City Department of Education educator pursuant to §3020-a of the Education Law. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:12 pm
.; 353 NLRB No. 12) Brooklyn, NY Sept. 25, 2008. [read post]