Search for: "Matter of Mark"
Results 1 - 20
of 28,416
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2008, 9:24 am
Eugene Rembor, Senior Partner of Rembor & Partners Ltd. in the U.K.: If marks would matter in life, a great many man and myself would be on benefits… Forget about marks, forget about them, what counts are your real life skills, not school wisdom. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 6:58 am
Popular discourse about trade marks does not seem to have the same political and ethical engagement as do patents and copyright (when is the last time that any Kat reader said to himself—“trade marks are a geopolitical matter”). [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 11:13 am
In a post titled West Boca principal faces debate over second speech, the Sun-Sentinel suggested that Principal Mark Stenner may have copied material that was used in his 2014 graduation speech, a separate matter from the copying in his 2015 speech.There is an issue here, although copying in speeches may draw less scrutiny than copying in academic papers and theses. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:02 am
Mark’s refreshing interpretation of Matter of Recinas from an international law perspective at a conference for beginner lawyers was a teaching moment even for an experienced practitioner like me. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 8:04 pm
The post Supreme Court to Decide if Marks With Scandalous Matter May Be Registered appeared first on DuetsBlog. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:26 am
Against that backdrop, this Kat (admittedly a bit of trade mark voyeur when considering OHIM jurisprudence from afar) wonders to what extent can we expect decisions matters before OHIM and the related courts to provide clear and workable guidelines on this issue. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 1:40 pm
His most recent book is Why the Constitution Matters, just out in May from Yale University Press, and lauded by [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:46 am
Mark Goulston The passing of Mark Goulston is a very personal and private matter for me… we have been close friends for some time. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 3:49 am
What mattered, the court found, was that Tommy Hilfiger owned a registration for the mark and Able Time’s use of the mark on watches created a likelihood of confusion. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 2:03 pm
Therefore, the Mark was declared invalid and struck from the Trade-mark Register. [read post]
25 May 2010, 11:25 am
Following up on yesterday's post on false marking, I learned today via Docket Navigator that at least one Court rejected a false patent marking defendant's argument that, as a matter of pleading, affixing an expired patent number to a product could not be actionable. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 3:30 am
"The post Should the Expectations of Consumers Matter? [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 10:43 am
Rather, it means that this is an unharmonized matter which, as a result, falls within the scope of national law.Turning to the EU Trade Mark Regulation, this expressly recognizes joint ownership of an EU trade mark but – like the directive – does not contain any provisions governing the conditions for its exercise by each and every joint owner. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 3:30 am
Mark McKenna Designs for articles of manufacture are eligible for design patent protection under section 171 of the Patent Act if they are “new, original and ornamental. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:32 am
Mark Strasser, Capital University Law School, has published What's It to You: The First Amendment and Matters of Public Concern at 77 Missouri Law Review 1083 (2012). [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 2:20 am
Supreme Court Decision 2008Do5897 delivered on January 30, 2009【Violation of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act】 Translation of Official Court Summary The appearance of a particular singer and unique actions of others are intangible and variable features close to an impression or image have little function as a fixed mark that differentiates a matter from another matter. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:18 pm
Since there is no definition for this term, it will be for the trade mark owner to demonstrate this as a matter of fact. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 4:50 am
On one hand, the court held that it did not matter that the word “COLLEGE” was disclaimed in the appellant’s trade mark registration as what matters was whether the disclaimed feature forms part of a composite mark. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 10:05 pm
In a decision Wednesday, the Third Circuit affirmed a district court's grant of summary judgment in a trademark case, finding the asserted mark not protectible as a matter of law.The district court granted summary judgment that the mark was generic. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:34 am
Fortunately, it just so happened that, on the day the Interflora hearing took place, this Kat was in Florida for the International Trademark Association's annual meeting to discuss the Courts & Tribunals Subcommittee's report on the use of survey evidence in trade mark matters. [read post]
