Search for: "Matter of Martin F."
Results 1 - 20
of 824
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
Does it Matter? [read post]
8 Jun 2013, 8:03 pm
The requirements of this section are satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims. [read post]
8 Jun 2013, 8:03 pm
The requirements of this section are satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:25 am
See Irey, 612F.3d at 1196–1225; Pugh, 515 F.3d at 1194–1203.And Judge Martin finishes like this:In sum, even though our case law purportedly requires “a significant justification”to support a “major departure” from the Guidelines, see Pugh, 515 F.3d at 1201, the panel’s review of Mr. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 6:29 am
The state had argued quite heatedly that R.C. 2125.021(F)(1)(b) could never be applied to violent offenses. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 7:40 pm
City of Greenwood, 751 F.3d 928 (8th Cir. 2014)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Ethics [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 5:46 pm
Martin Co. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
I urge any inclined to rush to judgment on this matter to view a reformed military commission hearing on pre-trial motions. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 6:28 am
Editor’s Note: Martin Lipton is a founding partner of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, specializing in mergers and acquisitions and matters affecting corporate policy and strategy. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 10:38 am
Martin v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 4:32 pm
" F**king finally. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
” In honor of Martin Luther King, Jr. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 2:15 pm
Martin & The Martin Family Trust v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 7:04 pm
Martin, their owner jumped at the chance to sell us a motorcycle and he was Johnny on the spot to get the deal done. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 7:30 pm
Yukins, 199 F.3d 867, 875-76 (6th Cir. 1999). [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 1:20 pm
Martin" requires careful review. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:58 pm
A quick search, by State Bar number, of the dockets of the First District Court of Appeal, alone, showed 17 matters initiated between April 2009 and October 2014, some completed some still active, in which Martin was at least one counsel of record. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 10:27 am
By Rodney F. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 7:17 am
And Robert F. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 7:44 am
However, neither the judge nor Martin’s lawyer raised Ohio’s Safe Harbor Law, R.C. 2152.021(F) (“Safe Harbor Law”). [read post]
