Search for: "Matter of Montgomery Group, LLC v Town of Montgomery" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  “Direct means Direct” generally limits coverage to losses of assets that the insured held in an account for a customer or owned by the insured. [2]   In Cumberland & Erly, LLC v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
In the course of identifying this second assumption, the Manual now points out that the doubling argument turns on applying “an average risk for the group” to each individual in the group. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am by Schachtman
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co., 461 F.3d 844 (7th Cir. 2006) (affirming summary judgment in disparate treatment discharge case, and noting judicial tendency to require “comparability” between plaintiffs and comparison group as a “natural response to cherry-picking by plaintiffs”); Miller v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
Agriculture & Nutrition, LLC, Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., and Olin Corporation. [read post]