Search for: "Matter of Murphy v City of NY"
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2011, 4:02 am
Murphy was employed as a per diem substitute teacher in Manhattan and the Bronx by the New York City Department of Education during the 2008-2009 school year for a total of 154 days. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:55 pm
Concerning name-clearing hearingsBrowne v City of New York, 2010 NY Slip Op 04583, Decided on May 25, 2010, Appellate Division, Second Department [Browne II]In general, a name-clearing hearing is to provide an employee who claims that he or she has been “stigmatized” by his or her employer with an opportunity to clear his or her name* The individual seeking such a hearing has the burden of proof in the proceeding.Typically the individual seeks a name-clearing… [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:13 am
Schindler v Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, LLP ; 2011 NY Slip Op 31519(U); Supreme Court, New York County; Docket Number: 115967/2010; Judge: Judith J. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 2:48 am
Schindler v Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, LLP ; 2011 NY Slip Op 31519(U); June 6, 2011 ;Supreme Court, New York County; Docket Number: 115967/2010; Judge: Judith J. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:27 am
Disciplinary charges must sufficiently specific so as to permit the accused to prepare his or her defenseWolfe v Kelly, 2010 NY Slip Op 08847, decided on December 2, 2010, Appellate Division, First DepartmentEric Wolfe, a New York City Police Department detective, was served with disciplinary charges alleging that He was guilty of perjury and the confiscation of drugs and money for personal gain involving Wolfe’s “stopping unidentified individuals in… [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Claiming absolute privilege or qualified privilege as a defense in litigation involving alleged defamatory statementsSpring v County of Monroe, 2019 NY Slip Op 00747, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentThe relevant facts in this action were not in dispute. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Claiming absolute privilege or qualified privilege as a defense in litigation involving alleged defamatory statementsSpring v County of Monroe, 2019 NY Slip Op 00747, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentThe relevant facts in this action were not in dispute. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
” Further, such an individual may be found to be disqualified for unemployment insurance benefits.Further, the decision in Blair suggests that a court could deem a retirement to be the equivalent of a resignation for the purposes of 4 NYCRR 5.3(b).* Blair v Horn, 2008 NY Slip Op 32581(U)[Not selected for publication in the Official Reports], is posted on the Internet at: http://www.leagle.com/decision/In%20NYCO%2020080929167/IN%20THE%20MATTER%20OF%20BLAIR%20v.%20HORN** For… [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Both plaintiff and the City moved for judgment as a matter of law or, alternatively, a new trial. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Both plaintiff and the City moved for judgment as a matter of law or, alternatively, a new trial. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:47 am
The affidavit of the plaintiff's process server constitutes prima facie evidence of proper service (see Matter of Perskin v Bassaragh, 73 AD3d 1073; Prospect Park Mgt., LLC v Beatty, 73 AD3d 885; Pezolano v Incorporated City of Glen Cove, 71 AD3d 970, 971; Cavalry Portfolio Servs., LLC v Reisman, 55 AD3d 524, 525; Jefferson v Netusil, 44 AD3d 621). [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:43 am
The affidavit of the plaintiff's process server constitutes prima facie evidence of proper service (see Matter of Perskin v Bassaragh, 73 AD3d 1073; Prospect Park Mgt., LLC v Beatty, 73 AD3d 885; Pezolano v Incorporated City of Glen Cove, 71 AD3d 970, 971; Cavalry Portfolio Servs., LLC v Reisman, 55 AD3d 524, 525; Jefferson v Netusil, 44 AD3d 621). [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 1:03 am
" Buxton v Plant City, 57 LW 2649, provides an example of this type of complaint. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 1:53 pm
In so holding, it is noted that any request for relief on the ground that the Legislature intended to provide better protection for EMTs who are injured in the line of duty would be better addressed by the Legislature. ( See Matter of Lidakis v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
Whitmer, 714 F.2d 1407, said:“the constitution does not require the government to give to its stigmatized employee a hearing if the public employee remains a public employee” and “the internal transfer of an employee, unless [the transfer] constitutes such a change of status as to be regarded essentially as a loss of employment, does not . . . give rise to a liberty interest meriting protection under the due process clause.The Simmons decision appears consistent with the law in New… [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 2:57 am
Cespedes v Kraja, 70 AD3d 622; Step-Murphy, LLC v B & B Bros. [read post]
