Search for: "Matter of New York City Transit Authority v New York State Public Employment Relations Board" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Association then participated in a mediation effort with Local 106 and the TA, but the mediation effort failed to resolve the conflict.The Association next filed a "Petition for Unit Clarification and/or Unit Placement" with the New York State Public Employment Relations Board [PERB]. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 2:45 am
Notice of a final administrative determinationCity of New York v Appl, 289 A.D.2d 144The New York City Board of Collective Bargaining [OCB] issued its "final determina­tion. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”Similarly, said the court, some cases have qualified for judicial intervention under the second prong of the public policy exception citing City of New York v Uniformed Fire Officers Assn., Local 854, IAFF, AFL-CIO, 95 NY2d 273, as an example. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am by Ryan Goodman
  Falsifying hush money payments as legal services frustrated New York State authorities’ more broadly. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The seminal case in New York State regarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Again, while the specific decisions cited by these New York experts may not be precedential in your jurisdiction, the issues these authors discuss are often similar to those faced all around the country. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 3:59 am
The Rodriguez Decision Rodriguez was a New York City Transit Authority [NYCTA] subway train operator for 16 years. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
The Trump administration took the matter to the Supreme Court, arguing that the Ninth Circuit got it wrong. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Initially, respondent argues that certain of petitioner’s allegations allege a binding past practice and that such claims are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Initially, respondent argues that certain of petitioner’s allegations allege a binding past practice and that such claims are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Initially, respondent argues that certain of petitioner’s allegations allege a binding past practice and that such claims are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Initially, respondent argues that certain of petitioner’s allegations allege a binding past practice and that such claims are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board. [read post]