Search for: "Matter of Ny Agency" Results 61 - 80 of 1,625
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2008, 4:09 pm
A case from the Third Department - Matter of Humane Socy. of United States v Fanslau, 2008 NY Slip Op 0668, indicates yes - partially. [read post]
3 May 2010, 1:51 am
Downloading employer’s computer records without approval disqualified terminated employee for unemployment insurance benefits Matter of Coleman v Commissioner of Labor, 2010 NY Slip Op 03022, decided on April 15, 2010, Appellate Division, Third Department Jermaine C. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:10 am by Stephen Bilkis
39 A.D.3d 868 835 N.Y.S.2d 320 2007 NY Slip Op 03705 In the Matter of JOQUAN JOMAINE-ANTHONY V., an Infant. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:06 am by Mark Weidemaier
That would be bizarre, as the difference wouldn't matter unless the meeting were poorly-attended. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 4:10 am
When seeking relief in the nature of mandamus, the individual must make the demand and await the agency’s refusal before filing an Article 78 petitionDonoghue v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2011 NY Slip Op 00425, Appellate Division, First DepartmentDismissing an Article 78 petition seeking one form of relief does not necessarily mean that that portion of the petition seeking other relief must be dismissed as well.Janice A. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
Matter of Verizon NY, Inc. v Mills, 2007 NY Slip Op 52616(U), Decided on August 10, 2007, Supreme Court, Westchester County, Judge Robert M. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 4:13 am
Authority of the New York City's Department of Investigation to compel an individual to comply with an "investigative subpoena"Matter of Parkhouse v Stringer, 2009 NY Slip Op 05205, decided on June 25, 2009, Court of AppealsVirginia Parkhouse's testimony at a public hearing before a New York City agency prompted a complaint by a public official, followed by a subpoena to Parkhouse from the New York City Department of Investigation (DOI). [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:31 am
The administrative tribunal, not the court, weighs the evidence and determines the credibility of witnesses in an administrative hearing Matter of Martin v Board of Trustees of the Vil. of Pelham Manor, 2011 NY Slip Op 06106, Appellate Division, Second Department The Village of Pelham Manor found Robert Manor, a Village police officer guilty of a number disciplinary charges filed against him including excessive use of paid sick leave and insubordination. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"[A]ny administrative appeal of a denial [must] be undertaken within 30 days of the denial (Matter of Snyder v Nassau County, 199 AD3d at 924); 5. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"[A]ny administrative appeal of a denial [must] be undertaken within 30 days of the denial (Matter of Snyder v Nassau County, 199 AD3d at 924); 5. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 4:02 am
Ordering worker to report to agency’s medical clinic for an examination does result in liability if the employee’s injury is exacerbating as a resultBonomonte v City of New York, 2010 NY Slip Op 09165, Decided on December 14, 2010, Appellate Division, First DepartmentDominic Bonomonte, a New York City Sanitation employee was on sick leave due to surgeries to his arm. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 12:44 pm by The Public Employment Law Press
Asking an administrative body to reconsider its earlier decision does not revive an expired statute of limitation without a fresh examination of the matter based on newly presented evidence2015 NY Slip Op 02977, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe Board of Education denied a teacher’s request for family health insurance benefits in May 2008, explaining that she was not eligible for coverage under the terms of the relevant collective bargaining agreement.In May 2012, the… [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 10:17 am by Rebecca Tushnet
“An administrative agency cannot exceed the authority Congress has granted it,” so the FCC couldn’t preempt state consumer protection law either. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
An administrative disciplinary penalty that is within the discretion of the reviewing agency to impose will not be disturbed by the court2014 NY Slip Op 00261, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe Board of Regents suspended an individual’s [LPN] license to practice as a licensed practical nurse in New York for two years following her pleading guilty to petit larceny to satisfy charges against her for fraudulently obtaining unemployment insurance benefits.LPN was sentenced… [read post]