Search for: "Matter of Pacor"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2010, 10:22 pm
Pacor, 743 F.2d 994. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 1:47 pm
In this case, we find the Lemco Gypsum/Pacor “conceivable effect” test satisfied. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 12:10 pm
Pacor, Inc., 543 Pa. 664, 674 A.2d 232 (1996). [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:34 pm
The Reporters take the position that aggregating litigation is simply a matter of degree, and we disagree. [read post]
23 May 2008, 10:17 pm
The trial court dismissed the matter for failure to state a claim because the plaintiff had no present injury, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. [read post]