Search for: "Matter of Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of the City of N.Y., Inc. v City of New York"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
[and] provide for a hearing and an appeal" (See Matter of Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of N.Y., Inc. v New York State Public Empl. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
[and] provide for a hearing and an appeal" (See Matter of Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of N.Y., Inc. v New York State Public Empl. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
’" Citing Matter of City of New York v Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of the City of N.Y., Inc., 14 NY3d 46, the Appellate Division held that "the presumption is that all terms and conditions of employment are subject to mandatory bargaining. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 8:42 am
”Concluding that collective bargaining over police disciplinary matters was prohibited, without exception, Supreme Court found that PERB's decision was affected by an error of law and granted the City’s petition challenging PERB’s ruling.The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s holding, explaining that “Although strong state public policy favors collective bargaining, there exists a "competing policy … favoring strong… [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 2:20 pm
[See, also, Matter of Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of N.Y., Inc. v New York State Pub. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
Relations Bd., 75 NY2d 660; and [2] "some subjects are excluded from collective bargaining as a matter of policy, even where no statute explicitly says so," citing Matter of City of New York v Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of the City of N.Y., Inc., 14 NY3d 46. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
Relations Bd., 75 NY2d 660; and [2] "some subjects are excluded from collective bargaining as a matter of policy, even where no statute explicitly says so," citing Matter of City of New York v Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of the City of N.Y., Inc., 14 NY3d 46. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:01 am
” The court note that the Police Department's scientific evidence indicated that inadvertently ingesting marijuana in contaminated food and inhaling secondhand smoke could not cause the high levels of marijuana Chiolalo’s hair samples.Although Chiolalo claimed that using the radioimmunoassay method of hair testing violated his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure because the use of that method was not authorized by the Police Department's collective… [read post]
31 May 2018, 10:10 am
Determining if a dispute between a public employer and an employee organization is arbitrableMatter of City of Long Beach v Long Beach Professional Fire Fighters Assn., Local 287, 2018 NY Slip Op 03356, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe City of Long Beach [Long Beach] filed a petition pursuant to CPLR Article 75 seeking a permanent stay of a demand for arbitration submitted by the Long Beach Professional Fire Fighters Assn., Local 287… [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
* The decision, City of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 4:16 am
The Court of Appeals has held that the Commissioner was empowered to choose the method of drug testing, and that choice was not subject to collective bargaining (see Matter of City of New York v Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of N.Y., Inc., NY3d , 2009 NY Slip Op 09314 [2009]). [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 11:29 am
Citing Matter of Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of N.Y., Inc. v New York State Pub. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:34 pm
Matter of City of New York v Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of N.Y., Inc., 56 AD3d 70; Reversed, New York Court of Appeals, 2009 NY Slip Op 09314. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:10 am
"* Matter of City of New York v Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of N.Y., Inc., 56 AD3d 70; posted on the Internet at:[www.nycourts.gov]The Goldin decision is posted on the Internet at:[www.nycourts.gov] [read post]
