Search for: "Matter of Petitions for Disclosure of Documents"
Results 1 - 20
of 836
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
" Accordingly, as noted earlier, the Appellate Division reinstated those branches of the petition which were to compel disclosure of certain records and for an award of attorney's fees and litigation costs, and remitted the matter to Supreme Court, Suffolk County, "for further proceedings consistent herewith and a new determination of those branches of the petition. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
" Accordingly, as noted earlier, the Appellate Division reinstated those branches of the petition which were to compel disclosure of certain records and for an award of attorney's fees and litigation costs, and remitted the matter to Supreme Court, Suffolk County, "for further proceedings consistent herewith and a new determination of those branches of the petition. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
"Accordingly, opined the Court, "DOCCS properly invoked the statutory FOIL exemption for privileged matters", citing Public Officers Law §87[2][a] and CPLR §4503[a].Following an in-camera review Supreme Court had earlier affirmed DOCCS' denial of disclosure of the 11 documents that were withheld and dismissed the petition. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
"Accordingly, opined the Court, "DOCCS properly invoked the statutory FOIL exemption for privileged matters", citing Public Officers Law §87[2][a] and CPLR §4503[a].Following an in-camera review Supreme Court had earlier affirmed DOCCS' denial of disclosure of the 11 documents that were withheld and dismissed the petition. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Providing a detailed description of each document and the basis for the disclosure or nondisclosure of each of the 257 documents, the court concluded that 32 of the documents were subject to disclosure in redacted form and dismissed Rose’s petition with regard to the remaining documents. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 2:32 am
Here, the Board denied a petition to disqualify counsel for Opposer INTS, ruling that, although the attorney had signed and verified certain documents pursuant to a power of attorney from opposer, he was not the sole source for information regarding those documents and therefore was not a "necessary witness. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:09 pm
Respondent complied with petitioner's FOIL request by providing him with 465 pages of responsive documents, albeit noting that some documents were exempt from disclosure or portions redacted. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:09 pm
Respondent complied with petitioner's FOIL request by providing him with 465 pages of responsive documents, albeit noting that some documents were exempt from disclosure or portions redacted. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 12:00 am
* Although the custodian of the records or documents requested may, as a matter of an exercise of discretion, elect to deny access to documents and records that are within the ambit of the several exceptions to disclosure authorized by FOIL, as the Court of Appeals noted in Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
* Although the custodian of the records or documents requested may, as a matter of an exercise of discretion, elect to deny access to documents and records that are within the ambit of the several exceptions to disclosure authorized by FOIL, as the Court of Appeals noted in Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:30 am
See Matter of New York Civ. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:30 am
See Matter of New York Civ. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
In a case decided last month, In The Matter Of The Petition Of Imperial Structured Settlements v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 8:08 pm
In the Matter of the Petition of Washington Square Financial, LLC, and Phillip L. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 11:55 am
At issue is an exemption from the Freedom of Information Act which protects from disclosure documents relating to internal personnel rules and practices of an agency. 5 U.S.C. [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:02 pm
Why does this matter? [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 3:34 pm
The proponent's excuse for failing to respond to the disclosure demand or to oppose the motion to dismiss the probate petition is that she was the only one who could care for her dying brother. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 7:51 am
The second rulemaking matter included something called an "examination support document" [ESD]: in the event that an application contains or is amended to contain more than ten representative claims, the applicant is required to submit an examination support document to "share the burden" with the PTO. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 5:29 pm
Matter of Sunter v. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 10:21 pm
Proponents objected to disclosure of the documents as barred by the First Amendment.... [read post]
