Search for: "Matter of Potts"
Results 21 - 40
of 77
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2023, 2:33 pm
The evidence shows that Potts was relentless in his quest to get Lewis to "repent" and that nothing Lewis or others did could dissuade him from purs[u]ing the matter. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:10 am
Potts complained, producing a photograph which was time- and date-stamped as evidence that he owned the copyright in the image. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:58 am
The Supreme Court’s inaction on the matter leaves uncertainty around the issue. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 12:09 pm
Y&H Corp., 546 U.S. 500 (2006), in which the Supreme Court addressed whether Title VII’s definition of “employer” was an issue of subject matter jurisdiction or an essential element of Title VII. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:57 am
Accordingly, a Brooklyn Probate Lawyer said based upon the affirmation and time records submitted by the guardian ad litem, the foregoing and the criteria to be used in fixing attorneys' fees as established by two cases, Matter of Potts in 1924/1925 and Matter of Freeman in 1974, the court fixed the fee of the attorney in the amount as requested and finds a fee of $1,800.00 to be reasonable. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:30 am
Potts and find that Ms. [read post]
21 May 2014, 7:39 am
Absent such certainty, the Agreement itself becomes a matter of risk, with the potential of a Title VII enforcement action. [read post]
12 May 2014, 6:36 pm
Based upon the criteria established by Matter of Freeman and Matter of Potts as applied to guardian’s ad litem, the court awards the guardian ad litem the fee of $9,000.00. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 7:04 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:04 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 7:05 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
14 May 2014, 6:34 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:13 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts (241 NY 593 [1925]), as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman (34 NY2d 1 [1974]). [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 11:09 am
In Potts v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:28 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman . [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:02 am
Victims can consult with the attorneys, without charge, about insurance claims, property losses, government benefits, or other matters arising from the recent wildfires. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 8:42 am
To review the matter, the Court looked to the case law and established that according to Potts v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 1:27 pm
The burden with respect to establishing the reasonable value of legal services performed rests on the attorney performing those services (Matter of Potts, 123 Misc 346 [Sur Ct. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:02 pm
No matter how liberal I am, I’m still outraged by crimes of violence. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 7:02 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, without constituting an adverse reflection on the services provided. [read post]
