Search for: "Matter of Providence v Annucci"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2017, 8:04 am
"Exemptions are to be narrowly construed to provide maximum access, and the agency seeking to prevent disclosure carries the burden of demonstrating that the requested material falls squarely within a FOIL exemption" (Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, 566 [1986] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Town of Waterford v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
14 May 2007, 1:00 am
Michael Annucci U.S. [read post]
