Search for: "Matter of Reinstatement of Rule 37"
Results 1 - 20
of 138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2008, 10:45 pm
The Defendants asked the court to award them costs for beating the Second Accident Rule 37 offer. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
B had complied with all rules and requirements of treatment and probationary supervision. [read post]
11 May 2011, 3:59 am
Quattrone v NYS Department of Education, 37 A.D.3d 939 Elizabeth G. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 11:00 am
’" Turning to the relevant statute, Judiciary Law §37(7), the court noted that §37(7), in pertinent part, provides that "Appointments, transfers and reinstatements to similar grade positions. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Co. of Am., 37 NY2d 91. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Co. of Am., 37 NY2d 91. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 4:16 am
Challenging a disciplinary termination Matter of Matter of Roberts v Board of Collective Bargaining of the Off. of Collective Collective Bargaining, 2011 NY Slip Op 08807, Appellate Division, First Department District Council 37, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, challenged the penalty of dismissal imposed on one of its unit member. [read post]
4 May 2020, 6:41 am
Therefore, it has issued the following updates to its earlier rules to provide relief in certain situations: Response due dates. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 4:10 am
The court of appeals stated that under Federal Rule 37, sanctions may include an order to pay the amount of reasonable expenses incurred in preparing the motion for sanctions, including attorney fees. [read post]
13 May 2014, 3:36 am
The Court of Appeals also ruled that the hit man, Smothers, could testify at Sanford's remand hearing.Well, now the Michigan Supreme Court has gone and reinstated the lower court order denying Sanford's request to withdraw his guilty plea. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
& Dev., 193 AD3d 483, 483 [1st Dept 2021], lv denied 37 NY3d 908 [2021]). [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
& Dev., 193 AD3d 483, 483 [1st Dept 2021], lv denied 37 NY3d 908 [2021]). [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 10:30 pm
" Since the matter was not dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to appear at a compliance conference (see 22 NYCRR 202.27; Dergousova v Long, 37 AD3d 645), or for any other reason, there was no requirement that the plaintiff submit an affidavit of merit or an explanation as to why the case was removed from active status. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 2:40 am
Located in 37 C.F.R. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:16 am
The Court of Session Inner House, by majority, reinstated the First-tier Tribunal’s decision finding in favour of the taxpayer. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 1:59 pm
Defendant moved to reinstate the answer. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 2:22 pm
It didn't seem to matter to the Court when the district court in U.S. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 5:38 pm
" Id. at *36 to *37.The Third Circuit also reinstated Broadcom's claim for attempted monopolization of the UMTS chipset market. [read post]
11 May 2013, 4:00 am
" Matter of Allen v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:58 am
The board’s issuance of these rules appears imminent. [read post]
