Search for: "Matter of Review of State Bar Dues Increase"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,206
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2013, 1:57 pm
The State Bar does not reimburse its delegates for travel or meeting expenses. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 3:55 pm
We are proud of the fact that State Bar dues have not increased in 27 years—proud that we are now inducting lawyers into our bar who weren’t born the last time dues were raised. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:56 pm
Here at MicroMash Bar Review we are always looking for reasons to celebrate. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:38 am
These are significant improvements that should provide more consistency, but will also need to be reviewed and assessed going forward. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:49 am
“Conflict Disqualifies Entire Wyoming Bar Counsel Office” — “Andrea Richard moved the Review and Oversight Committee (ROC) to disqualify Special Bar Counsel Wes Reeves and the Office of Bar Counsel from prosecuting the pending disciplinary proceeding against her due to a conflict of interest. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:02 pm
Given the polls, the chances are that it will keep it, notwithstanding the support for merit selection and retention elections from advocacy groups and the state bar. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 9:03 pm
To increase the number of qualified women who are eligible for the patent bar, Hannon suggested updating eligibility requirements to reflect modern educational trends. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 11:33 am
While a jury’s verdict was generally entitled to great deference, a particular verdict might be disturbed if it deviated materially from what would be considered reasonable compensation, as the reviewing court held was the situation in the case at bar. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 7:30 pm
A few weeks ago the state bar’s Review Board, which functions as the appeals court of the bar’s trial court, published a ruling that effectively prohibits lawyers representing homeowners in the hopes of getting their loan modified from accepting fees AFTER work has been completed. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 9:21 am
Increases the jurisdictional limit in civil matters to $200,000 for all SCCs. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 9:28 am
Thus far into the Bar Review Diaries, our intrepid columnists have been strangely in sync with each other. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 2:44 pm
(This commentary does not examine due-process and rule-of-law issues associated with U.S. antitrust enforcement at the state level, a topic that warrants scrutiny as well.) [read post]
26 May 2020, 5:45 am
This year has been incredibly challenging to attorneys across our state due to the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
” Because Thuraissigiam did not raise any of these issues in his habeas petition, and instead argued that his regulatory, statutory, and constitutional rights were violated, the district court found it lacked subject matter jurisdiction—because it was statutorily barred—to adjudicate Thuraissigiam’s claims. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 3:58 pm
By December 31, 2020, employers of any employee currently classified and paid on a salaried basis in reliance upon the White Collar or HCE Exemptions will need to:Confirm whether the employee earns sufficient compensation to qualify for continued coverage by the applicable exemption taking into account the changes implemented by the final rule;For employees disqualified for continued classification as exempt due to the increase in the required salary threshold, either… [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 5:14 pm
Partly that is due to different expectations in the audiences I write for in the blogosphere and in law reviews. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 6:15 am
That said, our fees have been settled on this matter and there are no outstanding issues. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 11:10 am
. **** New York Bar Association New AI Guidance: Part 2 In last week’s column, I shared news of the recent artificial intelligence (AI) guidance handed down by the New York State Bar Association’s AI Task Force in the “Report and Recommendations of the New York State Bar Association Task Force on Artificial Intelligence. [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:47 pm
Technically, the Bar reports to the state’s Supreme Court, but at the same time the Governor can prevent the Bar from collecting its dues, and as a result the state legislature is known to put pressure on the Bar as well. [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:47 pm
Technically, the Bar reports to the state’s Supreme Court, but at the same time the Governor can prevent the Bar from collecting its dues, and as a result the state legislature is known to put pressure on the Bar as well. [read post]
