Search for: "Matter of Richter" Results 21 - 40 of 374
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2011, 4:10 pm
David DeGroot, Special Counsel, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP and President, San Francisco Lawyers Chapter Bingham McCutchenSan Francisco, CA [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 6:44 am by Dan Bressler
Review client/matter intake forms and ensure completeness and accuracy. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
Richter (photo right), writing for a unanimous panel of the Manhattan-based Appellate Division, First Department, in Matter of Raharney Capital, LLC v Capital Stack LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 01425 [1st Dept Feb. 25, 2016], the court abandoned its contrary 1994 ruling in Matter of Hospital Diagnostic Equipment Corp. and, realigning itself with decisions by the Brooklyn-based Second Department and Albany-based Third Department, held that New York courts… [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
Richter (photo right), writing for a unanimous panel of the Manhattan-based Appellate Division, First Department, in Matter of Raharney Capital, LLC v Capital Stack LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 01425 [1st Dept Feb. 25, 2016], the court abandoned its contrary 1994 ruling in Matter of Hospital Diagnostic Equipment Corp. and, realigning itself with decisions by the Brooklyn-based Second Department and Albany-based Third Department, held that New York courts… [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Richter and Premo v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 12:45 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Since the combination could not be deduced directly and unambiguously, implicitly or explicitly, from the original and divisional application, the claims were invalid due to added matter. 2. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"*** Judges Richter and Kern dissented in part in a memorandum by Judge Richter, concluded that in view of Petitioner's "on-duty theft of money and his subsequent false statements, both of which are offenses involving moral turpitude, the penalty of termination is not so disproportionate to the offense as to shock one's sense of fairness. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"*** Judges Richter and Kern dissented in part in a memorandum by Judge Richter, concluded that in view of Petitioner's "on-duty theft of money and his subsequent false statements, both of which are offenses involving moral turpitude, the penalty of termination is not so disproportionate to the offense as to shock one's sense of fairness. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"*** Judges Richter and Kern dissented in part in a memorandum by Judge Richter, concluded that in view of Petitioner's "on-duty theft of money and his subsequent false statements, both of which are offenses involving moral turpitude, the penalty of termination is not so disproportionate to the offense as to shock one's sense of fairness. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"*** Judges Richter and Kern dissented in part in a memorandum by Judge Richter, concluded that in view of Petitioner's "on-duty theft of money and his subsequent false statements, both of which are offenses involving moral turpitude, the penalty of termination is not so disproportionate to the offense as to shock one's sense of fairness. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 9:24 am by Rebecca Jeschke
“But this is also a matter of public interest, and we hope the court sees this too. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 9:12 am by Mashel Law, L.L.C.
The Superior Court below dismissed Richter’s complaint because it concluded as a matter of law that Richter could not establish an adverse employment action by the BOE. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 11:20 am by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
In the meantime, please enjoy these remarkable oral proceedings before the Committee of Labour and Social Matters of the German Bundestag (in German only, but I’m sure you will catch the drift). [read post]
12 May 2022, 5:00 pm by Andrew I. Lief
Zhang’s duress claim was also barred because he ratified his promise to pay the buyer’s premium by paying that amount to Phillips and receiving the Richter work.[21] Finally, the unjust enrichment claim failed because such claims “may not be maintained where a contract exists between the parties covering the same subject matter. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 9:26 pm
Contents include:Wojciech Sadurski, Democratic Legitimacy of the European Union: A Diagnosis and Some Modest Proposals Roman Kwiecień, Does the State Still Matter? [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 5:23 pm by Karen Gullo
Moreover, the First Amendment right of public access to court records should also apply to wiretap orders.What: Hearing in the Matter of the Application of Michael A. [read post]