Search for: "Matter of S. G. v B. G." Results 1 - 20 of 2,544
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2023, 8:49 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
"We will remand the record to the Immigration Judge to determine if the respondent is credible, consistent with the First Circuit’s remand order [ Reyes v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 10:57 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
The BIA determined that Avila’s PSG did not “exist independently” of the harm alleged, as required under Matter of M-E-V-G-113 and Matter of W-G-R-. 114 Matter of M-E-V-G- cites to this Court’s prior precedent in Lukwago v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 3:59 am
Determining if a §3014-b “takeover of an education program” occurredIn the Matter of Elizabeth G. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
These included Hospira's Rule 50(a) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on the Issues of Safe Harbor, Noninfringement, Invalidity, and Damages and related briefing, Hospira's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Under Rule 50(b) and, in the Alternative, For Remittitur or New Trial Under Rule 59 and related... [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 6:45 am by FM Librarian
Matter of A-B- Analysis & Commentary:See this earlier blog post for background on the Attorney General's decision in Matter of A-B-. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 12:02 pm by Patricia Hughes
Now we have Ontario (Attorney General) v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This term will figure in the EBA’s answer. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The same documents D20 and D21 as used in the opposition proceedings concerning the patent in suit were invoked against the subject-matter of the application in suit. [read post]
1 Jan 2017, 8:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Jeffery Kaplan, Esq. of Levine & Kaplan for Petitioner Ari Gourvitz, Esq. of Gourvitz and Grourvitz for Respondent The parents jointly sought child custody to the Petitioner mother, and voluntary termination and surrender of the father’s parental rights. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 5:59 am by Michael C. Dorf
(b) B&G get a key provision of the Electoral Count Act wrong too. [read post]
  It followed that Gs Article 6 rights were not engaged at the internal disciplinary stage, but only at the subsequent ISA hearing. [read post]