Search for: "Matter of Seaman"
Results 21 - 40
of 348
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
., claiming he was a seaman injured in the course of his employment. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 1:52 pm
Plaintiff appealed the district court’s decision contending that, as a matter of law, a Jones Act seaman may not be held contributorily negligent when carrying out an order. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 6:00 am
Association of Maryland Pilots, the case concerning seaman status for maritime workers who spend time in the service of a moored vessel. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
This includes the seaman’s right to wages, which are protected by the Seaman’s Wage Act (46 USC 10101-11507). [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
As such, the trial court erred when it determined as a matter of law that Purdue and Williams were seaman. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 7:09 am
The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 3:49 pm
“No matter how the doctrine is formulated, one thing is clear—the duty of maintenance and cure exists for the benefit of seamen. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 8:25 pm
A former insurance executive, who now works with a state consumer ombudsman’s office for insurance matters, feel there’s one good answer: “For an injured seaman, the best step is to go find a qualified Jones Act attorney. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 10:53 am
This is the subject of Sandeen and Seaman's project. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 11:43 am
The matter was appealed. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 10:20 am
The High Court decided that seamen are entitled, as a matter of general maritime law, to seek punitive damages for their employers' willful and wanton disregard of its maintenance and cure obligation. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 10:20 am
The High Court decided that seamen are entitled, as a matter of general maritime law, to seek punitive damages for their employers' willful and wanton disregard of its maintenance and cure obligation. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 11:43 am
The matter was appealed. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 11:43 am
The matter was appealed. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 6:00 am
To make matters worse, Plaintiff’s cousin’s husband (another employee at the shipyard) was crushed by the crane and killed. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
Plaintiff, a seaman, injured his foot aboard a vessel owned by defendant. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 4:38 pm
The DC also raised a highly technical reason to try and keep a federal court from making any decision in the matter, the Jones Act lawyer pointed out….the DC claimed the case really came down to only a “factual” question. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:01 am
Knapp agreed with Seaman that Sacher had substantial responsibility for representing Seaman in the insurance coverage matter when she was with Calfee. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 11:04 am
Regrettably, the nature of the business means that accidents, injuries and property damage are inevitable, no matter how well workers do their jobs. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 1:43 pm
The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. [read post]
