Search for: "Matter of Serrano" Results 21 - 40 of 103
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2017, 7:00 am by Robert Harper
This post addresses New York’s recently-enacted digital assets legislation, as well as Surrogate Mella’s well-reasoned decision in Matter of Serrano, which appears to be the first reported case to apply that legislation. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 7:00 am by Robert Harper
This post addresses New York’s recently-enacted digital assets legislation, as well as Surrogate Mella’s well-reasoned decision in Matter of Serrano, which appears to be the first reported case to apply that legislation. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 9:35 am by Eric S. Solotoff
  Well, it took almost 5 years since I wrote those words, but the question was just answered by Judge Jones in his unpublished decision in the  case of Serrano v. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 5:04 pm by Ad Law Defense
Moses, 24 Cal.4th 1122, 1132 (2001) (citing Serrano III). [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  I think Laffitte will, as a practical matter, change little about the way percentage fees are calculated and awarded in state court cases. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:51 am by Sean Wajert
 Under CAFA, a federal district court has subject matter jurisdiction “over class actions involving [1] at least 100 members and [2] over $5 million in controversy when [3] minimal diversity is met (between at least one defendant and one plaintiff-class member). [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:51 am by Sean Wajert
 Under CAFA, a federal district court has subject matter jurisdiction “over class actions involving [1] at least 100 members and [2] over $5 million in controversy when [3] minimal diversity is met (between at least one defendant and one plaintiff-class member). [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:51 am by Sean Wajert
 Under CAFA, a federal district court has subject matter jurisdiction “over class actions involving [1] at least 100 members and [2] over $5 million in controversy when [3] minimal diversity is met (between at least one defendant and one plaintiff-class member). [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:23 am by Lorene Park
However, the investigation disclosed that they had committed more serious violations, which justified their terminations, and their claims failed as a matter of law (Serrano v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 11:03 am
As a threshold matter, the “spoken words” of Mason’s purported challenge do not indicate a willingness to enter into a contract. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 2:03 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The issue on this appeal concerns matters dehors the record. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:34 am by INFORRM
The defamatory statements made about Dr Serrano have not been justified, and the facts and matters on which the comment was made, have not been proved [259]. [read post]