Search for: "Matter of Smith v Condon"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2018, 6:10 am
“of late, an important shift has occurred in the views of state and lower federal courts, which have increasingly found fault with “new-generation” SORN laws, which in many respects are more expansive and onerous than those condoned by the” Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:46 am
While it may be understandable that blue lies matter, they matter to everyone, not just Trump supporters. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 12:52 pm
Which added, albeit in a footnote, the following: "We are not in any way condoning the prosecutor? [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 10:28 am
Fail-Safe LLC v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 10:28 am
Fail-Safe LLC v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am
Contrary to Devereaux’s contention, the allegedly defamatory statement made by Burrows was not actionable because it was absolutely privileged as a matter of law (see Brady v Gaudelli, 137 AD3d 951, 952; El Jamal v Weil, 116 AD3d 732, 734; Bisogno v Borsa, 101 AD3d 780, 781; Kilkenny v Law Off. of Cushner & Garvey, LLP, 76 AD3d 512, 513), and does not support a finding of a violation of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Seldon… [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 6:07 pm
See Smith v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:23 pm
It would appear to be a straightforward matter on its face. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 8:11 am
Norwegian goes on to cite the decision in Armor Screen Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am
The matter went all the way to the House of Lords and was a [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:15 pm
’ ” Id., at 318 (citing Smith v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 1:00 pm
The court’s decision in Fulton v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 7:29 am
Razkane v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 5:02 am
From Cooper v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:26 pm
" In Re the Matter of M.J., Elika Jackson, and Carl Jackson v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 1:20 pm
Earnshaw v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:06 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:27 pm
The district court observed: “The form does not require the county clerk to condone or endorse same-sex marriage on religious or moral grounds. [read post]
