Search for: "Matter of Stewart v Roberts" Results 41 - 60 of 218
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2015, 3:58 pm by Sean Hanover
Russell, 411 U.S. 423, 441 (1973) (Justice Stewart dissenting); Hampton v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm by Blog Editorial
Peter Stewart v The Queen (Jamaica), heard 28 March 2011. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
 A federal district court judge in Texas has set the starting trial date for the United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 11:40 am by Ronald Mann
The justices finished up the first week of the new term by finally hearing argument in Google v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:51 pm by Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog
Today the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Microsoft v. i4i, where Microsoft argued that attempts to invalidate patents using prior art not considered by the USPTO should be judged by a "preponderance of the evidence" instead of the more demanding "clear and convincing" standard.The SCOTUS bench consisted of only 8 Justices, as Chief Justice Roberts recused himself from the case; Justice Scalia sat in on his behalf.First up was Thomas Hungar,… [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 3:51 am by Vanessa Sauter
Benjamin Wittes shared the second part of his interview with Mike Doran, which takes a deep-dive into how Doran views Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation and the Russia matter. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 3:59 am by Garrett Hinck
Robert Chesney argued that the government's arguments in ACLU v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 1:38 pm by William Ford
Eliot Kim summarized the Second Circuit’s ruling in Linde v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 12:28 pm by Amy Howe
The case, Mahanoy Area School District v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:54 am by Scott Bomboy
Justice Robert Jackson’s majority opinion affirmed that forcing public school students to salute the American flag was unconstitutional. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 4:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The essential elements of a breach of contract cause of action are “the existence of a contract, the plaintiff’s performance under the contract, the defendant’s breach of that contract, and resulting damages” (Liberty Equity Restoration Corp. v Maeng-Soon Yun, 160 AD3d 623, 626 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Stewart v Berger, 192 AD3d 940, 941). [read post]