Search for: "Matter of Storer" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2017, 2:34 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The recordbefore the Board showed sufficient variability and unpredictabilityto support the Board’s conclusion that Storer’sprovisional application did not enable the interferencesubject matter. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 8:15 am by Robert Schaffer
The Court found that Storer’s earlier provisional application (filed June 28, 2002) did not enable the subject matter of Storer’s interfering claims... [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 10:00 pm
Clark, the Court of Appeals explored whether a provisional application had sufficiently enabled interference subject matter. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 10:37 am by Astarita
 The CFTC's order finds that Rege violated the Commodity Exchange Act and imposes a trading ban for a period of at least three years, disgorgement that will be deemed satisfied by the payment of disgorgement under the SEC's order, and an additional penalty of $100,000.The SEC's investigation in this matter was conducted by Cynthia Storer Baran, Naomi Sevilla, Brian Fitzpatrick, and Robert Baker of the Asset Management Unit, with the assistance of Deena Bernstein… [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 6:11 pm
However, the judgment does disclose that the defendants had been asked to pay £27,000 and that they had made an open offer of £10,000 to settle the matter. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 3:37 am
" Storer says his family's health and quality of life are being compromised. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
(a) Did the Second Circuit err, as a threshold matter, in applying this Court's decision in Storer v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
This case is an attorney fee/legal malpractice matter in which it was alleged that the client "approved" monthly statements. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
This case is an attorney fee/legal malpractice matter in which it was alleged that the client "approved" monthly statements. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 2:01 am
.* Passing off the National Guild of Removers and StorersEver-productive Rosie Burbidge writes the story of those "pretending to be in the club" --several third parties passing themselves off as being members of The National Guild of Removers and Storers after their membership had ceased, and the extent to which the defendants should be liable for advertisements on third party websites. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:47 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Representative of the Court's treatment of election mechanics is the formulation the Court used in 1974 in Storer v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:52 pm
Yet the Court has also stated that, “as a practical matter, there must be a substantial regulation of elections if they are to be fair and honest,” Storer v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by msatta
Storer emphatically rejected the notion that a woman should decide this question for herself because, he explained, during pregnancy a “woman’s mind is prone to . . . derangement. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 7:04 am
**********************************************  PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 20 [week ending Sunday 16 November] -- More on Jeremy’s Francis Gurry Lecture "IP in Transition: desperately seeking the Big Picture"  | OHIM and trade marks on 3D and 2D animals’ devices  |  Size of patent drawings matter  |  IPKat e-mails causing problems (but we still love you)  |  Helmut Kohl’s injunction against the… [read post]
17 May 2022, 1:28 am by INFORRM
A cheery post on the HM Courts and Tribunals Service blog recently announced that developers were now working on on  Making hearing lists more accessible to court and tribunal users This is long overdue. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
Never too late 20 [week ending Sunday 16 November] -- More on Jeremy’s Francis Gurry Lecture "IP in Transition: desperately seeking the Big Picture"  | OHIM and trade marks on 3D and 2D animals’ devices  |  Size of patent drawings matter  [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:29 pm
Among the significant –- but, really, very-well indexed –- number of issues, the decision delves into novelty, inventive step, insufficiency by excessive claim breadth, added matter, and claim construction in light of the influential Actavis v Eli Lilly, another Arnoldian decision that the very same judge clarifies further in this ruling. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:04 am by Jason Rantanen
This assessment is conducted on a claim-by-claim basis[ii] to see if the parent provisional adequately supports and enables the precise subject matter of each child non-provisional claim for which priority is desired. [read post]