Search for: "Matter of Tiffany"
Results 1 - 20
of 420
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2020, 1:11 pm
Tiffany & Co. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 8:15 am
In a new episode of the podcast “Understanding IP Matters,” the fascinating serial entrepreneur Tiffany Norwood laments that while “so much of our world is driven by imagination, only a few of us take our imagination seriously. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 1:38 pm
However, the district court did not agree and granted Tiffany summary judgment, stating that “Costco had failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to nay of the factor relevant to the infringement analysis, that Costco’s far use defense failed as a matter of law, and that Costco’s infringement constituted counterfeiting as a matter of law. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:41 am
” Tiffany argues that, as a matter of law, the “Tiffany®” mark has not been genericized. . . . [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 1:25 pm
While this case generally supports the legal principle that website operators are not directly responsible for users' actions on that site in the US, courts in the EU have been less consistent on the matter. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 8:17 am
The federal district court in Manhattan erred in concluding as a matter of law that Costco’s use of the word “Tiffany” to describe diamond engagement rings amounted to willful trademark infringement and counterfeiting, warranting compensatory and punitive damages exceeding $21 million, the U.S. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 8:40 am
Should the facts of this matter reveal that the apartment complex owner or management company failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, the family of Tiffany McKnight may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for her wrongful death. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 11:09 am
That, however, assumes that the matter gets to the jury. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:57 pm
Attorney Tiffany […] [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 1:47 pm
The District Court’s order granting Tiffany’s motion for summary judgment was therefore an abuse of discretion requiring the Second Circuit to vacate the decision and remand the matter for trial. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 7:37 pm
And if the matters truly are cost-be-damned kinds of matters, its hard to fault the logic. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:02 pm
The court concludes its discussion on willful blindness by saying “eBay appears to concede that it knew as a general matter that counterfeit Tiffany products were listed and sold through its website….Without more, however, this knowledge is insufficient to trigger liability under Inwood. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 5:50 am
So I was a big proponent, and still am of legal project management on matters. [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:36 pm
The Court stated that, as a general matter, “[a] service provider is not, we think, permitted willful blindness. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 4:50 am
Yes, as a general rule the burden of proof is on the plaintiff in civil matters, but hasn’t Tiffany shifted that burden by coming forward with the undisputed claim that massive amounts of counterfeit merchandise is being sold on eBay? [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 8:15 am
In a new episode of the podcast “Understanding IP Matters,” the... [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:14 am
The Court stated that, as a general matter, “[a] service provider is not, we think, permitted willful blindness. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 7:57 pm
" Tiffany argued that this statutory recognition that there is a broad universe of potentially trademark-able matter militates against the court carving out a blanket ruling that protection for single colors for use on fashion items is not available. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 1:01 pm
An issue in Tiffany v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 6:57 am
What struck this writer as interesting about the otherwise not especially remarkable matter is the barely-concealed disdain for the defendant and its merchandise-for-the masses business model permeating the federal court complaint of the elite plaintiffs. [read post]
