Search for: "Matter of William P. v Margaret P." Results 21 - 33 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2010, 11:46 am by Roshonda Scipio
Sayward and Margaret Vandiver.Knoxville : University of Tennessee Press, c2010.Children(RES) TZ2 .AB83D 2010Children and the law : doctrine, policy, and practice / by Douglas E. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
Music Matters One Song, Two Copyrights Trying to determine the public domain status of music can present another trap for the unwary. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am by David Pocklington
He cited Lord Fraser in R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am by Schachtman
One of Selikoff’s great achievements, the federalization of worker safety and health in the Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970,3 languishes because of inadequate resources for enforcement and frivolous efforts to address non-existent problems, such as the lowering of the crystalline silica permissible exposure limit. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
The Commission devoted significant resources to evaluating its enforcement program in 1972.[9]  In January 1972, Chairman William Casey created a three-member committee to “examine the SEC’s enforcement policy and practices, engage in frequent dialogue with the members of the Commission and with our staff, seek and sift the suggestions of the bar and make recommendations to the Commission for worthwhile improvements to our time-honored ways. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
When introducing the Supreme Court Bill in December 2002, the Attorney-General, the Hon Margaret Wilson, said that the new Supreme Court was expected to hear about five times the annual number of cases heard by the Privy Council. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
And there is the matter that the anonymous critic was offering a criticism that was also not peer reviewed. [read post]