Search for: "Max Factor & Co. v. Factor"
Results 41 - 60
of 86
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2015, 12:16 pm
The Pennsylvania case is Wisniewski v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:37 am
Black Brothers Co., 391 A.2d 1020 (Pa. 1978), in Tincher v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 12:45 pm
[Max Mosely]. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:15 am
[Max Mosely]. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:15 am
[Max Mosely]. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm
Section 1 – Serious harm A statement is no longer defamatory unless a claimant can show that ‘…its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to [his/her] reputation…’ This section builds on the jurisprudence of Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) and is intended to deter trivial claims. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 7:52 am
Fisher v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 1:04 am
[Conception] is amental act . . . .Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 11:12 am
Supreme Court case of Gross v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:47 am
In its view, several factors indicated the inmate was not a proper candidate for the other unit because he was not a generally violent youth. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 5:18 am
Co. (3d Cir.1984). [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:40 am
Reciting Seager v Copydex and Banks v EMI Songs, the former judge stated that 'where an inventor wanted to sell his idea for money, money is what he got'. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
The Judge referred to the Court of Appeal decision in Adams v Cape Industries [1990] 1 Ch 433, which set out the major factors to be considered, and also pointed out the “principal test” as to whether a company carried on activities in England & Wales was whether that company’s representative located in England & Wales had authority to contract on behalf of the company. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:41 am
© Max Kennerly. [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:48 am
© Max Kennerly. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:04 pm
© Max Kennerly. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 12:03 pm
, Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:31 am
’ I would argue that whether or not the co-defendants acted independently is in cases like these not a potentially relevant factor, but a crucial factor. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 10:12 am
© Max Kennerly. [read post]
