Search for: "May v. Board of Directors" Results 101 - 120 of 5,319
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2021, 6:17 am
Under the law, each public company was required to have a minimum of one woman on its board of directors by the close of 2019. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 4:22 am
Board's Rejection of Plurality-Plus Director Resignation: Delaware Weighs In A few weeks ago, the WSJ ran an article about how some boards were rejecting resignations by directors after they failed to achieve a majority vote "for" at an annual shareholders meeting. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
  The district director, Benefits Review Board, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit disagreed. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 6:02 am
The Court interpreted the fairly common "continuing director" provision in the indenture in a way that could have been expected, stating the board may approve as continuing directors persons nominated by dissident stockholders. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 9:00 am by Albert H. Manwaring, IV
”  Section 141(k) contains two exceptions to the default rule where the removal of directors may be limited to “for cause” only removals: (1) where the board is “classified” under Section 141(d) (i.e., has multiple classes of directors with staggered terms of service, in contrast to the default “straight” board having a single class of directors), or (2) where the stockholders have cumulative voting… [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 11:49 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
Circuit which deals with the legality of President Obama’s recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board, Noel Canning v. [read post]
Sibelius concerns the extent to which the guarantee of free exercise of religion under the Constitution and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act may be asserted by for-profit corporations, the Court’s decision may also have important—and unsettling—implications for state corporate laws that define the fiduciary duties of boards of directors. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 1:22 pm
Adkins Holding:  (1) The traditional business judgment rule applies to a disinterested and independent board of directors' refusal of a stockholder litigation demand, not the modified business judgment rule established in Boland v. [read post]