Search for: "Mays v. Levi"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,080
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2024, 10:02 am
Copan Italia S.p.A. v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
Matter of Davis v Schley2024 NY Slip Op 02614Decided on May 10, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 10, 2024Before: Moulton, J.P., Scarpulla, Shulman, Higgitt, O'Neill-Levy, JJ.Index No. 153380/24 Appeal No. 2415 Case No.… [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
Matter of Davis v Schley2024 NY Slip Op 02614Decided on May 10, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 10, 2024Before: Moulton, J.P., Scarpulla, Shulman, Higgitt, O'Neill-Levy, JJ.Index No. 153380/24 Appeal No. 2415 Case No.… [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:29 am
The owners of the sectional titles would pay levies to the body corporate who would then pay the municipality. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
Source: USPTO Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:00 am
However, his reasons for walking on the floor despite the warnings are irrelevant since a slip and fall would not be unexpected in the circumstances.A remand to the Trustees is not warranted since they considered the statements of the three witnesses, which were consistent, and petitioner did not deny that their account of the incident was accurate (see Matter of McCartan v Shea, 211 AD3d 534, 535 [1st Dept 2022]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE… [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:00 am
However, his reasons for walking on the floor despite the warnings are irrelevant since a slip and fall would not be unexpected in the circumstances.A remand to the Trustees is not warranted since they considered the statements of the three witnesses, which were consistent, and petitioner did not deny that their account of the incident was accurate (see Matter of McCartan v Shea, 211 AD3d 534, 535 [1st Dept 2022]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE… [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:12 am
A recent US Supreme Court decision, Sheetz v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 3:32 am
By 2011, LMEG had three one-third owners: Zalman Schochet, Levi Wilhelm, and Menachem Farro. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
Levy, and David Madigan. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am
” “In support of this argument, IMTC cited two foreign (and therefore non-binding) cases in which no conflict of interest was found to exist: Jones v AMP Perpetual Trustee Company NZ Ltd (1994) (New Zealand) and HSBC (HK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice (2001) (Hong Kong). [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 10:48 am
Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:08 pm
Does 1-2 et. al. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 1:52 pm
Levy, 641 So. 2d 103 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Thus, in Matter of Levi v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 5:23 am
For other cases rejecting pseudonymity for defamation plaintiffs, see Levy v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 4:07 pm
In 74 Pinehurst LLC v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 1:10 pm
As Justice Brandeis wrote in his canonical concurring opinion in Whitney v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:45 am
Concur—Kapnick, J.P., Friedman, González, O’Neill Levy, JJ. [read post]
