Search for: "Mays v. Paul"
Results 61 - 80
of 7,364
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 12:58 pm
On February 19, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in Paul Cheatham IRA v. [read post]
30 May 2010, 6:54 am
When the Court decided United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 4:11 pm
Hunt v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 5:00 am
*Citing Paul v NYC Department of Education, 146 AD3d 705, the Appellate Division, rejecting Coach's contention that hearsay testimony should not have been admitted at the hearing, holding that the hearing officer "was entitled to rely on hearsay" in sustaining the U-Rating give Coach. * In Gray v Adduci, 73 NY2d 741, the Court of Appeals said that it was well established that "hearsay evidence can be the basis of an administrative determination. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 7:16 am
In the end such rankings are arbitrary and unhelpful, and they are also, I think, more or less unique to rock-- we don't argue about Miles Davis v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 4:36 pm
The claimants in were three of Paul Weller’s children: Dylan, 16, and 10-month-old twins John-Paul and Bowie. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 10:39 am
Describing the Court's emergency injunction in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 6:00 pm
As we have discussed in previous posts, Paul Barnaba has been pushing for an early trial and previously filed a Motion for Severance in May. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm
The failure by the House of Lords to address this issue clearly has caused difficulties in later cases, particularly Hutcheson v NGN [2011] EWCA Civ 808, Ferdinand v NGN [2011] EHWC 2454 (QB) and McClaren v NGN [2012] EWHC 2466 (QB) where this public right not to be misled has been interpreted generously to justify publications concerning fairly trivial immorality by well-known individuals. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 11:14 am
On Friday we filed this reply brief in No. 08-514, Mitchell v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:39 am
NOTE: This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 11:05 am
It has been suggested that the court may have been better off enforcing the 'equal' portion of Plessy v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:22 pm
Div., A-5400-08T3, December 10, 2010: Although a parent may not waive child support as it belongs to the child, Gotlib v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:15 pm
In Marino v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 5:06 am
It's also consistent with the Landrian v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:29 am
In this post, Isabel Emerson, Senior Associate, and Anna Walsh, Partner, in the Clinical Risk and Medical Advisory and Professional Discipline and Regulatory team at CMS preview the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Paul and another v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust (2) Polmear and Anor v Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust and (3) Purchase v Ahmed These three conjoined appeals were heard by the Supreme Court on 16 – 18 May 2023. [read post]
California Court of Appeal Holds That Unexpected Work Expenses May Be Reimbursable Continue Reading…
9 Aug 2023, 1:51 pm
Paul Thai was employed by defendant and respondent IBM. [read post]
20 May 2010, 6:05 pm
Under New York v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 3:00 pm
Newdow (0:01), he began by asking “may I ask you just one question? [read post]
