Search for: "Mays v. Pinkney et al"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2013, 9:51 am
In B&H Securities, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Minn. 2008)(noting that some but not all courts have concluded relative risks under two support finding expert witness’s opinion to be inadmissible) XYZ, et al. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Supp. 740, 785, 836 (E.D.N.Y. 1984) (“A government administrative agency may regulate or prohibit the use of toxic substances through rulemaking, despite a very low probability of any causal relationship. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:15 am
Pinkney v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:58 am
Pinkney v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:58 am
Pinkney v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am
An association between the dependent and independent variables in an observational study may not be causal, but may instead be due to confounding. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Colo. 2006), rev’d and remanded on other grounds, 618 F.3d 1127 (10th Cir. 2010), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___ (May 24, 2012) Cotroneo v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
See also Manual at 614 n. 198., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
