Search for: "McCartney v. McCartney"
Results 61 - 80
of 135
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2009, 5:47 am
Beal v McCartney, Plymouth County Court, 12 March 2009. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 5:39 am
” See also Cox v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:21 am
(The Seventh Circuit, in Gaiman v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:41 am
” In short, as summed up by the court in People v. [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 5:02 pm
The misuse of social network sites are increasingly coming to the attention of the courts: see McCartney, AG’s reference (No.8 of 2009) [2009] NICA 52, AB Limited and Others v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:52 am
The leading case on the issue is the House of Lords judgment in the 2004 case of R v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
" Citing Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v Long Is. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors; Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors (Pretty Polly Limited); and Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited… [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 4:30 am
And did you know that if you stare long enough at the Supreme Court carpet it spells out ‘Paul McCartney is dead’? [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 5:35 am
The average time between a parent claiming child support and receiving any payment is now 17 years and 11 months.October - The House of Lords gives it's judgment in the landmark case of Black v Black. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 3:45 am
President Can't Duck Dish Copyright Suit – Law360 https://t.co/JJw1WNuZHx -> Not Exactly a Netflix Tax: Where Canada Stands on a Digital Sales Tax – Michael Geist https://t.co/aWm3n470K8 -> Paul McCartney Sues to Get Back His Beatles Songs https://t.co/N4h9Huz81u -> 12 Things You Could Still Do If SOPA Had Passed – The Illusion of More https://t.co/iz75yqSgLu -> [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 3:55 am
Ford and Flowers v. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 3:47 pm
Apologies to Lennon and McCartney. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:27 am
But since each judge has his or her own background and personal experience, what may be plausible to Judge McCartney may not be plausible to Judge Lennon. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 3:15 am
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2017-05-27 https://t.co/ZSkhV4vKH2 -> Bankruptcy stays injunctive relief claim for copyright Syndic de Pigeat, 2017 QCCS 2043 https://t.co/djLsM4Acad -> Default judgment grants for blank levy royalties Canadian Private Copying Collective v Redpact Impex 2017 ONSC 3038 https://t.co/wYO9Db99X4 -> Tech transfer agreement transferred all rights in patents Composite Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 12:20 pm
C-Rod v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 11:50 pm
Of the 3 cases, McGrath v United Kingdom, McCartney v United Kingdom, and Brecknell v United Kingdom, the leading judgment is that handed down in Brecknell.Brecknell concerned the attack on Donnelly's Bar in 1975 in which three people were killed and six seriously injured. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 WL Congo 1 and 2 & anr v Secretary of State for the Home Department and KM (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-18 November 2010 Baker… [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
Hughes v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors; Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors (Pretty Polly Limited); and Baker v Quantum Clothing Group… [read post]
