Search for: "McClellan v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 96
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am
Carey & James McClellan eds., 2001). [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:04 pm
McClellan, 12-1480 (after five relists), prompting a dissent from Justice Alito (joined by Justice Scalia), arguing that, contrary to the Sixth Circuit’s “serious misreading” of Harrington v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:15 am
McClellan, No. 12-1480. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 6:45 am
McClellan (12-1480), a test of federal courts’ duty in habeas cases to defer to summary rulings by state courts in criminal cases. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 8:29 am
Young, 13-95, the state-on-top habeas case asking whether (1) a state can forfeit application of the Stone v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 7:39 pm
Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:52 pm
Young 13-95Issue: (1) Whether the state forfeits an argument that Stone v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am
McClellan, 12-1480 (whether dismissal “for lack of merit in the grounds presented” is adjudication on the merits), and Unger v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm
United States, Berghuis v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am
McClellan, 12-1480 (asking whether dismissal “for lack of merit in the grounds presented” is adjudication on the merits), and Unger v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am
McClellan, 12-1480 (asking whether dismissal “for lack of merit in the grounds presented” is adjudication on the merits), and Unger v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
Young 13-95Issue: (1) Whether the state forfeits an argument that Stone v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
McClellan, 12-1480, a state-on-top habeas case asking whether a court’s dismissal “for lack of merit in the grounds presented” meant that it had adjudicated the claim on the merits for purposes of AEDPA. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Young 13-95Issue: (1) Whether the state forfeits an argument that Stone v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 7:38 am
Lowell McClellan or Lincoln? [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 6:58 am
McClellan v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:26 pm
It is, in fact, impossible to conceive how it could have done so more overtly than in Bush v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
United States Surgical Corp. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 12:19 pm
McClellan v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 1:17 pm
According to the court, quoting a prior pain pump case McClellan v. [read post]
