Search for: "McConnell v State" Results 381 - 400 of 732
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2008, 9:21 pm
On Monday, the city of Pleasant Grove, Utah, filed this opening brief with the Supreme Court in the case of Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 2:28 pm by Andrew Hamm
Howard Fischer of Havasu News reviews Harris v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 9:20 am by Stephen Wermiel
” The much-quoted line comes from West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:03 pm by admin
Attempting to clear up some of this public confusion is Floyd Abrams, who represented Senator Mitch McConnell as amicus curiae in the case. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 8:44 am by Neil H. Buchanan
Buchanan One of the safest bets in recent years was that Republicans would conveniently drop the pretense that they believe in states' rights as soon as their manufactured Supreme Court super-majority handed them their long-sought repeal of Roe v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 3:37 am
How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are:  Haygood v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 5:08 am by Amy Howe
The National Immigration Law Center has an explainer on United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:22 am by Edith Roberts
” In Prawfsblog, Jack Preis discusses Manuel v. [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 2:29 pm
Try teaching some of Rehnquist's more murky opinions -- say, Morrison v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by JB
Lash has a sixty-page selection of post-ratification materials, including, for example, The Slaughter-House Cases and United States v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:44 am by Joshua Matz
Capato and argues that “the Court was right to leave the Social Security question of parentage to the states, but the burden is now clearly on the states to clarify the rules. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Daniel B. Edelman
Constitution, including most notably the Equal Protection Clause.As noted in Bush v Gore, a state’s determination shall be “conclusive” only if made pursuant to a law “made prior to election day” by which the “state legislature has provided for final determination of contests or controversies . . . . [read post]