Search for: "McConnell v State"
Results 61 - 80
of 828
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
EFF appealed the case before the state's transparency board, which eventually forced Escobedo to release a slideshow and receipts showing the city had wasted more than 4 million pesos on the Sistema de Predicción de Delitos (SPRED) project. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:31 pm
Cogan and Michael McConnell discuss the US Supreme Court amicus brief they filed, along with scholars Christopher DeMuth and Peter Wallison, in Biden v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:39 am
Congratulations to the longest serving Senate Leader in history, Mitch McConnell. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:28 am
Especially notable is this brief by Michael McConnell and others. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
As Michael McConnell has explained, Wilson was also primarily responsible, along with Rutledge, for dividing the royal prerogatives between Congress and the President, hence for the specific enumeration of executive powers in Article II. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am
It also includes the writings of such originalist scholars as well as Nathaniel Chapman, John Harrison, Kurt Lash, Michael McConnell, Ryan Williams, and Ilan Wurman. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm
But in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 6:17 pm
Nothing a state legislature does under the authority of Moore v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:32 am
Janus v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Gissel Packing Co. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
To be sure, in 2013, in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
See, e.g., AARP v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
Today's essay will focus on the second point, harnessing evidence from an order the Court issued yesterday in Ward v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
The debate in many ways goes back to Justice Holmes’s typically cryptic dissenting opinion in Lochner v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 5:00 am
These include so-called “take-home” lawsuits where the plaintiff is not the employee (typically barred by workers compensation laws), but a relative (a claim approved by a California appellate court in See’s Candies, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:23 pm
McConnell is one of the top constitutional law scholars in the country, and I was delighted that he passed along this item on National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm
Hildebrant (in 1916), to Smiley v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 7:32 am
Harper (plus a few additional thoughts on redistricting remedies)] On Tuesday, Michael McConnell and I published a piece in The Atlantic about the Supreme Court's pending case of Moore v. [read post]
