Search for: "McCormick v. District of Columbia" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2016, 12:44 pm by Susan Ross (US) and Robert Rouder (US)
On October 17, 2016, a US federal trial court in the District of Columbia ruled that a competitor may pursue a Lanham Act claim for false advertising due to a container of black pepper. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 3:39 pm by Susan Ross (US)
On October 17, 2016, a US federal trial court in the District of Columbia ruled that a competitor may pursue a Lanham Act claim for false advertising due to a container of black pepper. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 3:39 pm by Susan Ross (US)
On October 17, 2016, a US federal trial court in the District of Columbia ruled that a competitor may pursue a Lanham Act claim for false advertising due to a container of black pepper. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:30 am by Douglas Melcher
On July 7, 2011, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided three cases by written opinion issued for publication. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 1:23 pm by HR Hero
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 1997 and has served as chief judge since 2013. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 6:02 pm by Ad Law Defense
  These lawsuits were consolidated and transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in December 2015. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:22 pm by Aurora Barnes
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’s judgment and instruct that court to remand the case to the district court with directions to dismiss all claims for prospective relief regarding pregnant unaccompanied minors. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:51 pm by Aurora Barnes
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’s judgment and instruct that court to remand the case to the district court with directions to dismiss all claims for prospective relief regarding pregnant unaccompanied minors. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm by John Elwood
McCormick Foundation, 16-317. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am by John Elwood
And who knows – it may be that the arrival of a new Philadelphia district attorney and his new staff had something to do with the settlement. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 2:09 pm by Aurora Barnes
McCormick Foundation 16-317 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
Box 1406 Columbia, SC 29202 Phone: (803) 737-0391; (800) 436-8190 (V/TTY/Toll Free) Fax: (803) 737-0140 E-mail: rratterree@sces.org Web: http://www.sces.org/es/specgrp.htm South Carolina Speech To Speech Relay Service Phone: (800) 735-7277 (Toll Free) ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY Technology-Related Assistance SC Assistive Technology Project USC, School of Medicine-Center for Disability Resources 8301 Farrow Road Columbia, SC 29208 Phone: (803) 935-5340 Fax:… [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am by John Elwood
Chicago and District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:03 am by Scott Bomboy
And in 1978, the House and Senate approved an amendment to grant congressional voting rights to the District of Columbia after hearing were held in Bayh’s subcommittee. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’s judgment and instruct that court to remand the case to the district court with directions to dismiss all claims for prospective relief regarding pregnant unaccompanied minors. [read post]