Search for: "McDonald v. City of Chicago" Results 161 - 180 of 562
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am by John Elwood
City of Chicago. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 11:43 am by Andrew Hamm
(That absence was made even more apparent by the presence in the audience of Justice Clarence Thomas, who in McDonald v. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 11:55 am by John Floyd
City of Chicago (2010) lent constitutional credence to the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:30 am by David Kopel
The 2nd Circuit cited but did not follow the Supreme Court’s City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 10:35 pm
I was very proud to participate in a CAC amicus brief in McDonald v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:19 pm
What progress has been made on gun law reform in state legislatures this year? [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Time] Rest of the Economist article is of interest too, especially on ADA filing mills in Florida and elsewhere; In Sheehan v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Napolitano, 604 F.3d 732, 744 (2d Cir.2010) (discussing City of Chicago v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Moreover, facial challenges "outside of the First Amendment context" may be permissible "in the presence of a constitutionally-protected right," Dickerson v Napolitano, 604 F3d 732, 744 (2d Cir 2010) (discussing City of Chicago v Morales, 527 US 41 [1999]). [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Indeed, federal district courts have rejected challenges to the firearms licensing schemes that were adopted in the District of Columbia and Chicago following Heller and McDonald. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 11:33 am by Stephen Bilkis
Summary of the Constitutional Arguments Relying on District of Columbia v Heller, 554 US 570 (2008), and McDonald v City of Chicago, 130 S Ct 3020 (2010), defendant argues that PL § 265.01(1) is an unconstitutional prohibition of his right to possess a firearm in his home for the purpose of self-defense. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am by David Cruz
  Yet of the more “conservative” Justices who ruled in McDonald v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 6:40 am by Schachtman
” In 2010, Justice Scalia, who was a law-review-producing law professor for the University of Virginia for several years, responded to a lawyer’s oral argument, in McDonald v. [read post]