Search for: "McDonald v. Strong" Results 201 - 220 of 244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2010, 12:29 am
Despite High Court Skepticism, Advocates Defend Privileges Clause Push The National Law Journal A broad spectrum of scholars and advocacy groups agreed that McDonald v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm by Ronald Collins
Jeffrey Toobin, in particular, has a strong political viewpoint. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Corey Robin in connection with Robin’s new book, “The Enigma of Clarence Thomas” (Metropolitan Books, 2019). [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 9:07 am by Matthew Kahn
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
People favor their own product portfolio: cereal companies have good sodium standards, but lax sugar standards, whereas McDonald’s has decent sugar standards but no sodium standards. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
” Isolation of the “outbreak strain” from a food product provides strong support (“The Smoking Gun”) for epidemiological studies implicating the same food; however, a positive food sample is not a requirement to take action to prevent new illnesses (e.g., recall and/or stopping distribution of an epidemiologically implicated food). [read post]