Search for: "McDonnell & McDonnell v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 632
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2018, 12:57 am by Eszter Szakács
Eszter SzakácsCo-author: Zsolt Lengyel, Danubia Patent and Law Office Just a few months before the CJEU’s judgment in C-121/17 Teva UK Ltd and Others v Gilead Sciences Inc. came out a the Metropolitan Court of Budapest handed down a decision regarding Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp’s (MSD) application for an SPC re the combination of ezetimibe and rosuvastatin. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 9:33 pm by Patent Docs
Sanofi • The State of Biotech Patenting: Challenges • Maximizing Patent Term for Products... [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 12:15 pm by Patent Docs
Sanofi • The State of Biotech Patenting: Challenges • Maximizing Patent Term for Products... [read post]
Another example is a brief by former federal officials in McDonnell v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:31 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This is what the City Council wanted in enacting the law, and this is how the state courts are now interpreting it.The case is Suri v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 1:31 pm by Jacqueline Buffa
The US Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit then vacated the guilty conviction [JURIST report] on the basis of the decision of the Supreme Court in McDonnell v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 6:25 am by Joy Waltemath
The district court had sided with the employer and considered all of the evidence; the employee asserted that this was an incorrect application of the McDonnell Douglas framework, and that the applicable framework should have been determined by state substantive law. [read post]
8 May 2018, 8:48 am by Eric Dama
In 1973, the United States Supreme Court issued a landmark employment discrimination case, McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 8:48 am by Eric Dama
In 1973, the United States Supreme Court issued a landmark employment discrimination case, McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 6:20 am by Joy Waltemath
The court also overruled various objections to the magistrate’s memorandum and order as to expert testimony on class certification (Chen-Oster v. [read post]