Search for: "McDonnell & McDonnell v. State" Results 241 - 260 of 632
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
In the Kentucky Law Journal, law student Jordan Shewmaker looks at Honeycutt v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:32 am by Joy Waltemath
In limited circumstances like these, said the court, “the fundamental principle of access to courts must bow to the fact that a nation without sound intelligence is a nation at risk” (Abilt v. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 9:29 pm by Sme
Simplot Co. (10th Cir., Dec. 15, 2016) (affirming summary judgment in favor of Simplot on Jackson's pregnancy discrimination claim, under the McDonnell Douglas test)*Ewing v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 11:19 am by Mays & Kerr LLC
Nevertheless, the trial court awarded summary judgment to the school district, determining that the superintendent failed to prove, as required under the McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 6:50 am by Joy Waltemath
A jury would also decide if the lead employee’s comment and “constant” racial slurs created a hostile work environment (Gilliam v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 9:01 am
"In Unanimously Wrong, Dean Chemerinsky explains why the "Supreme Court's decision in McDonnell v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 9:26 am by Edith Roberts
Coverage continues of pre-election challenges to various state voting law restrictions. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 4:33 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Here is the abstract: In a unanimous opinion in McDonnell v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 11:14 am by Zachary Price
Just this past Term, the Court held unanimously in McDonnell v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Supreme Court overturned their convictions, in McDonnell v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 1:54 pm by Lawrence S. Goldman
The Supreme Court decision in McDonnell v United States, decided June 27, has given several politicians whose corruption convictions are on appeal both a cause for optimism and freedom on bail pending appeal. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 6:19 am by Joy Waltemath
In so doing, the court revived the Section 1981 and state law race discrimination claims of a fired shipping company broker, finding the evidence sufficient to dispute the company’s assertion that it fired the broker for falsifying records (Ortiz v. [read post]