Search for: "McFarland v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2017, 3:13 pm by A. Brian Albritton
” Section 517 does not reference statements of interest or filing briefs on behalf of the United States; rather, it only provides: The Solicitor General, or any officer of the Department of Justice, may be sent by the Attorney General to any State or district in the United States to attend to the interests of the United States in a suit pending in a court of the United States, or in a court of a State, or… [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
’” Citing McFarland v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 241 AD2d 108, the court explained that "[A]s long as the investigation is sufficient and the [petitioner is] afforded a full opportunity to present his [or her] claims, [i]t is within the discretion of [SDHR] to decide the method or methods to be employed in investigating a claim. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 4:24 pm by AstuteLegalVideos.com
The Court in the Portillo v Bhara case stated, Here, the executive authority of Guatemala, alone, has the power to extradite Portillo, a Guatemalan citizen, to the United States. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
There again, the peculiarly interesting state of trade mark law in the United Kingdom and, not far beyond it, in the territory of the European Economic Area, might be closer to the cause. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Seventh-day Adventist Church’s blog, Todd McFarland maintains that although “it is disappointing that the court did not take” Patterson v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:00 pm by Bexis
Sanofi-Aventis United States LLC, 2011 WL 3666595, at *3 (W.D. [read post]