Search for: "McFarlane v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2019, 11:44 am
(A “United States work” is a work first published in the United States, or simultaneously published in the United States and any foreign country; or an unpublished work (or a work first published in a nation with whom the United States does not have a copyright treaty) for which all authors are citizens of or domiciled in the United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 1:09 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
Court of Appeal hearing On 29 and 30 November 2016 the matter was heard before the Court of Appeal bench comprising of McFarlane, Davis, and Sharp LJJ. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
Court of Appeal hearing On 29 and 30 November 2016 the matter was heard before the Court of Appeal bench comprising of McFarlane, Davis, and Sharp LJJ. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
Court of Appeal hearing On 29 and 30 November 2016 the matter was heard before the Court of Appeal bench comprising of McFarlane, Davis, and Sharp LJJ. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 9:05 am
The concept was previously stated in Trs. of Columbia Univ. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 1:53 am
The Court held that, in principle, the right to respect for private life under Article 8 can extend to the professional lives of the social worker and police officer (R (Wright) v Secretary of State for Health and R (L) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis). [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:00 pm
In Eweida and Others v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm
Jeremy Wright MP has been appointed as Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport following Matt Hancock’s appointment as Health Secretary. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:00 am
The individual conscience is free to accept such dictated law, but the State, if its people are to be free, has the burdensome duty of thinking for itself. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:18 am
This ruling represented arguably the most important family law case decided by the Supreme Court and the most significant judgment dealing with ancillary relief matters since Miller v Miller, McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
This point includes relevant text of a recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights, Eweida and Others v. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 2:04 pm
Crabtree v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
In Hart v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:06 am
With that in mind, a secular judge must be wary of straying across the well-recognised divide between church and state. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:45 am
A notorious recent example was Lord Carey’s intervention in McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd, an unfair dismissal claim brought by a relationship counselor who as a result of his Christian beliefs refused to promote gay sex. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:29 pm
The support of Strasbourg jurisprudence was noted, in particular the cases of Sergey Kuznetsov v Russia [2008] ECHR 1170, Lucas v UK (App No 39013/02) 18 March 2003, and Appleby v UK (App No 44306/98). [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
Perhaps also, we should reconsider the decentralization v centralization binary as a central concern for how local government actually operates. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 19 and 20 June 2018 the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Mcfarlane and Sharp LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm
Last Week in the Courts As already mentioned, on 11 July 2019 Sir Andrew McFarlane handed down judgment in the case of R (TT) v Registrar General for England and Wales [2019] EWHC 1823 (Fam), the case concerning the identification of a transgender male who had given birth. [read post]
