Search for: "Mead v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 486
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2011, 11:18 am by Bill Raftery
” In Copp, the state’s supreme court (then known as the Superior Court of Judicature), referencing a similar Wisconsin case (Meade v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 9:18 am
Illinois Dep't of Revenue, No. 06-1413 In a case raising the issue of whether Illinois constitutionally taxed an apportioned share of the capital gain realized by Mead, an out-of-state corporation, on the sale of one of its business divisions, Lexis/Nexis, a judgment in the state's favor is vacated and remanded where: 1) the state courts erred in considering whether Lexis/Nexis served an "operational purpose" in Mead's business… [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 7:44 am by Wells Bennett
It is here that we take in the sorta-live broadcast of pretrial proceedings in United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 12:41 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
Another example is Teva v Janssen[3][2021] EWHC 1922 (Pat) in which Meade J granted expedition such that the trial would be heard in a similar time frame.[4]Meade J noted that he would have considered an even earlier trial listing had the court diary permitted it but was not prepared to take another case out of the diary to achieve this. [read post]
The Court’s approach to confidentiality Meade J began his analysis with a reminder of the key principles identified by the Court of Appeal in OnePlus v Mitsubishi ([2020] EWCA 1562). [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 6:56 am by Bexis
  The court’s decision on this point relied heavily on a 2000 decision of an intermediate appellate Florida state court – Davis v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Similarly, Hacon HHJ stated in Teva v Novartis [2022] EWHC 2847 (Pat): “It seems that there was little or no interaction between Novartis’ three experts during the preparation of their evidence. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 4:41 am
This morning, January 16th, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case of Mead Corp. v. [read post]
The Administrator of the Uniform Consumer Credit Code for the State of Colorado, Julie Ann Meade, has filed motions to dismiss the complaints filed in federal court by two state-chartered banks seeking to permanently enjoin enforcement actions brought by the Administrator against the banks’ nonbank partners. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 8:34 am by Ronald Mann
Robbins (1997), in which the Court deferred to an agency’s interpretation of its own regulation, or was prohibited by the intervening decision in United States v Mead Corporation (2001). [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Numerous studies show that Chevron deference is currently the exception rather than the rule, and since 2001’s United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 3:05 pm
The Supreme Court released an interesting opinion today in Mead v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by Wells Bennett
Today begins the open portion of a week-long slate of hearings in the 9/11 military commission case, United States v. [read post]