Search for: "Means v. City of Chicago" Results 21 - 40 of 940
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2011, 7:38 pm by Kevin Funnell
The city of Las Vegas, Nevada, has apparently decided to roll the dice and, as Chicago did a couple of months ago, try an end-run around the 14th Amendment. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:44 am
This means that there is constant property development going on all over our fair city, and with that development comes unique legal problems. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:22 am by SHG
A number of emails arrived yesterday asking what I thought the McDonald decision meant for New York City. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 8:47 am by Mike Scarcella
A lawyer for Chicago, Suzanne Loose, assistant corporation counsel, said in court papers the high court decision in McDonald v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 11:37 pm by Orin Kerr
Petitioners’ position was rejected by the post-Civil War Justices, who were in the best position to understand the meaning of the Privileges or Immunities Clause. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 12:25 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 The City had taken the position that the Inspector General lacked the authority to sue, since he was merely part of the City of Chicago, meaning that his suit amounted to the city suing itself – an intra-agency spat that belonged in the political branches. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 1:28 pm by mjpetro
The government alleges that Fenzl engaged in a scheme to defraud the City of Chicago (the "City") of money and property related to bids submitted for, and the performance of, Specification No. 17390A (the "Contract"), to repair and refurbish the City's refuse disposal containers. [read post]