Search for: "Mehulic v New York Downtown Hosp." Results 1 - 2 of 2
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Doctrine of Collateral Estoppel does not bar litigating claims involving the same parties that were not previously considered in prior administrative or judicial actions
13 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Doctrine of  Collateral Estoppel does not bar litigating claims involving the same parties that were not previously considered in prior administrative or judicial actionsMehulic v New York Downtown Hosp., 2017 NY Slip Op 06416, Appellate Division, First DepartmentFollowing a number of adverse administrative rulings, Surana Mehulic brought an Article 78 action against her former employer, New York Downtown… [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
A Big Mess and Legal Malpractice Too
14 Feb 2018, 4:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The court acted within its discretion in denying plaintiffs’ motion for leave to renew their recusal motion (see People v Moreno, 70 NY2d 403, 405 [1987]; People v Glynn, 21 NY3d 614, 618-619 [2013]; Mehulic v New York Downtown Hosp., 140 AD3d 417 [1st Dept 2016]; CPLR 2221[e]). [read post]
New York Attorney Malpractice Blog - http://blog.bluestonelawfirm.com/