Search for: "Mendez v. May" Results 61 - 80 of 208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2017, 4:42 am by Edith Roberts
Mendez, a Fourth Amendment case stemming from a police search that resulted in a shooting. [read post]
23 May 2023, 11:00 pm
.# # #DECISIONMuchnik v Mendez Trucking, Inc. [read post]
23 May 2023, 11:00 pm
.# # #DECISIONMuchnik v Mendez Trucking, Inc. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Dismissing an employee before he or she has completed his or her probationary period Kriloff v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2017 NY Slip Op 06713, Appellate Division, First DepartmentIn York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals indicated that "it is well settled that a probationary employee may be discharged without a hearing and without a statement of reasons" where the decision is made in good faith and not for a constitutionally impermissible… [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 12:22 am
In Mendez v Valenti, 101 AD2d 612, the Appellate Division held that retaining Mendez on the payroll until the end of payroll period for administrative convenience did not result in his attaining tenure in the position. [read post]
30 May 2013, 4:31 am
Mendez annulled the City’s rules that resulted in the several previously “unallocated positions” being allocated to a salary grade. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 4:59 am
Continuation on the payroll for a brief period after the expiration of a probationary period does not automatically result in the individual attaining tenure by estoppel [Mendez v Valenti, 101 AD2d 612]. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:22 am by Joel R. Brandes
" See Silverman, 338 F.3d at 900-01 (finding that general regional violence in Israel does not establish a "zone of war"); Mendez Lynch v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 2:36 pm
  By virtue of the check being 20 cents short, he may be out of luck.FURTHER UPDATE:There are actually two checks on file with the Department. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 1:34 pm
All this money and attorney's fees wasted by the state on something that accomplishes essentially -- probably, literally -- nothing.I can't believe we don't have better things to do with our time.Anyway, the case gets remanded back to Judge Mendez. [read post]