Search for: "Mendez v. May"
Results 81 - 100
of 208
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, May 07, 2008 US v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:42 am
In Mendez v Valenti, 101 AD2d 612, the Appellate Division held that retaining Mendez on the payroll until the end of payroll period for administrative convenience did not result in his attaining tenure in the position. [read post]
23 May 2023, 8:30 am
Supreme Court’s 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:30 am
However, in Scherbyn v Wayne-Finger Lakes BOCES, 77 NY2d 753, the Court of Appeals held that where the rules of a civil service commission specifically set out the reasons for which a probationary employee may be dismissed, the appointing authority's broad discretion with respect to terminating the services of probationers is subject to the limitations imposed by those standards. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:27 am
” Mendez v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 1:43 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITImmigration Law
Removal Action Remanded; Errors Raised Issue Whether 'Exceptional Hardship' Standard Met
Mendez v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:59 am
IMMIGRATION LAW Mendez v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 3:59 am
Concur—Gische, J.P., Oing, Scarpulla, Mendez, JJ. [read post]
30 May 2017, 7:58 am
In Los Angeles County v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Supreme Court, May 19, 2008 US v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:08 am
In Mendez v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:25 am
One exception to the general rule applied for the purpose of determining if an individual has attained tenure by estoppel is set out in Mendez v Valenti, 101 AD2d 612. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 4:37 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 11:52 am
One case, Gupta v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
Germany, Jr. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 9:40 am
U.S. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 11:04 am
In a recent case Mendez-Rojas v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 8:43 am
Weber, May 15, 2023, Mendez, J.).Background. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:46 am
In Mendez-Garcia v. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
This action, however, may highlight a growing concern the SEC has for digital tokens and their sale to investors. [read post]
