Search for: "Mendez v. May"
Results 141 - 160
of 209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2019, 1:01 pm
’s recent decision dismissing a website accessibility complaint in Himelda Mendez v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Determining the status and rights of an employee in the public service terminated from his or her employmentHanson v Crandell, 2016 NY Slip Op 05604, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe Supreme Court dismissed William A. [read post]
23 Jul 2016, 12:00 am
The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that Rossignol failed to demonstrate that, under the governing statutory standard, he was entitled to disability retirement benefits.Group prayer while on dutyMarrero-Mendez v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:14 am
” (Grant v Mendez, 2013 NY Slip Op 33750[U], *3 [Sup Ct, Westchester County 2013]). [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 3:37 pm
Mendez and People v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:25 am
Mendez we see the rara avis. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Such was the case in Mallon v Parness, 167 A.D.2d 614. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:16 am
In Mendez v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 3:00 pm
In Massie v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 8:34 am
In Tennessee v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 4:39 am
Ironicallythis case too ended up in Civil Court.David v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 12:20 pm
Chao, 463 F.Supp.2d 184, 190-91 (D.Conn.2006); Oppenheimer Mendez v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 12:50 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 12:50 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 7:01 pm
Escobar-Mendez, 986 P.2d 227, 230 (Ariz. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:40 pm
May is Asian/Pacific American Heritage Month. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:34 am
MENDEZ, Appellee. 3rd District. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:51 am
.* At the end of the extended probationary period the school district may grant or deny tenure [see Juul v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
"Findlaw summaries [may] include opoinions that have not yet been released for publication and may be subject to modification, correction or withdrawl U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, August 25, 2008 US v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am
Mendez, the court ruled 8-0 that the Fourth Amendment does not support the U.S. [read post]
