Search for: "Mercedes Benz USA"
Results 41 - 60
of 127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2015, 10:33 am
Mercedes-Benz USA has announced plans to move from its Montvale, NJ headquarters, pictured, to Georgia. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:33 am
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, No. 13 C 8413, Slip Op. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:57 am
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, No. 13 C 4417, Slip Op. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 3:18 am
Mercedes-Benz USA LLC, No. 13 C 4417, Slip Op. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 1:53 pm
Mercedez-Benz USA, LLC, 732 F. 3d 1376 (Fed. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 7:24 am
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, 732 F.3d 1376, 1379 (Fed. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 6:56 am
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, Case No. 2:14-cv-00003-CJB-MBN (E.D. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 7:56 am
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, No. 2:14-cv-00003 (E.D. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
Allegedly the Argentinian government of the time collaborated with the Argentinian subsidiary (Mercedes-Benz Argentina) of a German corporation (Daimler AG) in committing nefarious acts – on Argentinian soil. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 2:47 pm
Jurisdiction over Daimler had been found by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal[1] on the ground that Mercedes-Benz USA was Daimler’s “agent” for jurisdictional purposes and therefore that subsidiary’s contacts with California could be imputed to Daimler itself. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:01 am
Personal jurisdiction over Daimler was predicated on the California contacts of Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (MBUSA), yet another Daimler subsidiary, one incorporated in Delaware with its principal place of business in New Jersey. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:53 pm
And they brought the action in California -- not where Daimler's main United States sub (Mercedes-Benz USA or MBUSA) had incorporated (Delaware) or the state in which MBUSA kept its main place of business. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:31 am
The plaintiffs had tried to get Daimler in California through Mercedes Benz USA, which actually conceded general jurisdiction in California (ironically, the Court's ultimate analysis means MBUSA is not subject to general jurisdiction in California, since it is incorporated in Delaware and has its PPB in New Jersey). [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 11:58 am
Bauman thus freed the defendant, a corporation whose subsidiary, Mercedes-Benz USA, “is the largest supplier of luxury vehicles to the California market,” from a 2004 lawsuit brought by 22 Argentinians. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm
Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC (7/30/12) 208 Cal.App.4th 26, review granted 10/24/12 (Case No. 205263) and briefing deferred pending Iskanian: Putative consumer class action under the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), the Unfair Competition Law (UCL), and other California statutes. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 9:08 pm
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, No. 2013-1007 (Fed. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 6:39 pm
MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC The issue:Ibormeith IP, LLC, the assignee of U.S. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 9:07 pm
The subsidiary is Mercedes-Benz USA. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 2:41 pm
Applying an agency theory, the panel concluded that Daimler AG had sufficient contacts with the state of California by virtue of the actions of its subsidiary Mercedes Benz USA to give California personal jurisdiction over the German parent , even though Mercedes Benz USA had no involvement with the alleged facts in Argentina. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 12:21 pm
Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC, 145 Cal.Rptr.3d 296 (2012) (rev. granted, briefing held pending Iskanian); Franco v. [read post]
